By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Columbia University is expected to announce a federal deal involving a partnership with the Anti-Defamation League and adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism, which could be used to stifle criticism of Israel. University officials, in collaboration with the Trump administration, restructured the University Judicial Board to impose harsh sanctions on student protestors, who were demonstrating in support of Palestine and demanding divestment from Israel. This is indicative of the university’s pattern of prioritizing political alignment over student rights, as seen in its previous cooperation with ICE. The university’s actions are viewed as an attack on free speech and any criticism of Israel.
Read the original article here
Trump Crashes Out Over Damning Resurfaced Photos With Epstein, and the story starts with a clear act of avoidance. When a reporter dared to ask about the newly unearthed images of him with Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump abruptly hung up the phone. This immediate reaction speaks volumes, doesn’t it? It’s a classic move, a deflection, an attempt to control the narrative by cutting off the conversation. The implication is clear: these photos are problematic.
The mere existence of these photographs, and the context in which they’ve surfaced, is enough to set tongues wagging and fuel speculation. They’re not just snapshots; they’re a visual record of a connection, a relationship between Trump and Epstein. And given what we know about Epstein’s activities, the images inevitably cast a dark shadow. The fact that Trump, a man known for his bluster and bravado, chose to hang up instead of address the issue directly tells you everything you need to know about how the photos are perceived by Trump and his team.
It’s understandable that some people are skeptical. The internet, after all, is awash in stories, many of them designed to grab attention rather than convey truth. Some may dismiss this as a distraction, a way to score political points. But the core of the matter remains: there are photographs, and they show a connection between Trump and Epstein. The response, or lack thereof, is often more revealing than the facts themselves. The absence of a straightforward denial, the sudden silence, the hang-up – these are all signals that something isn’t right.
The context of these photos, emerging from a variety of sources, also matters a great deal. The images from Trump’s 1993 wedding, for instance, show Epstein in attendance, seemingly without explanation. The surfacing of these images adds another layer to the puzzle and provides a basis for public outcry. These are not just pictures; they’re pieces of a larger puzzle, a story that continues to be written and revised.
The argument over the photos highlights a deeper tension – the ongoing political divide in the United States. The situation allows for each side to push its own narrative, with very little room for compromise. Trump’s supporters might see this as another smear campaign, while his critics are seeing yet another red flag. The reality is likely far more complex, and the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.
It is important to note that there is always a question of what constitutes “damning” evidence. What some people see as clear-cut proof of wrongdoing, others may view as mere coincidence or guilt by association. This is a classic tactic for those accused of wrongdoing. The narrative shifts based on what they want the public to believe.
Then, there’s the question of why this information is surfacing now. Is it a coincidence, or is there a deliberate strategy at play? The timing is almost as important as the content itself. The appearance of these photographs at this particular moment in the public discourse isn’t random. The fact that the former president is currently facing other legal battles and scrutiny certainly does not help the situation. These revelations have the potential to further damage his image.
Some comments focus on the frustration that nothing ever seems to stick. The idea is that Trump has weathered many storms, and this will be just another one. However, the nature of these accusations, particularly those of a sexual nature, is different from his other scandals. While he has been known to deflect such claims, the pressure from the public to get the whole story, especially if he knew of such actions, can mount with these types of charges.
And, let’s not forget the fundamental principle that an innocent person would fully cooperate with such questions. The immediate hang-up, the lack of any attempt to explain away the photos, simply fuels the fire and raises more suspicions. It’s a tacit admission that he has something to hide.
Overall, Trump’s response to the resurfaced photos with Epstein is as damning as the images themselves. His actions only serve to amplify the controversy and invite further scrutiny.