By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump stated that Jeffrey Epstein had taken female staff from his Mar-a-Lago residence, including Virginia Giuffre. Trump claims he warned Epstein about poaching staff and eventually “threw him out” for doing so again, asserting that this was a negative action. When asked if the staff in question were young women, the president responded affirmatively, citing that the details of this situation were already widely known. This information surfaced amidst calls for the release of remaining evidence regarding Epstein and his associates.
Read the original article here
Trump: Epstein stole my spa staff, including Virginia Giuffre
The issue of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has always been a murky one, but the recent revelations seem to be taking a turn for the darker. The situation is no longer just about association; it’s increasingly about acknowledging what the association entailed and the kind of activities that flourished in its shadow. It’s like, one might ask, who among us hasn’t employed scores of underage girls at our spa and then ended a multi-decade friendship when our friend hired them away? Does that sound familiar?
Trump’s reported explanation that Epstein “stole” staff, specifically mentioning Virginia Giuffre, is quite telling. This isn’t just about losing an employee; it suggests a sense of ownership, a possessiveness that raises serious questions about the nature of the employment arrangements and the activities taking place. The use of the word “stole” implies that these individuals were, in some way, considered property. The story takes a darker turn when you remember that Giuffre first came forward in 2011 and was on record by 2015. The fact that Trump seems to corroborate her story by his words is quite something.
The idea that a multimillionaire would be concerned about losing a teen employee to another place of business seems off. Would the same have been said if a groundskeeper had decided to work for Epstein instead? The fact that Trump reportedly ejected Epstein from Mar-a-Lago because of his “theft” of a staff member from his spa is also questionable. After all, it’s widely documented that Epstein was introduced to Giuffre at Mar-a-Lago, which leads to some obvious questions: Why was a minor working there in the first place, and how many other children were employed there?
The use of coded language, such as “massages,” “dinners,” and “parties,” in Epstein’s circles is another critical aspect of understanding the situation. Court documents, depositions, and even Epstein’s infamous black book reveal the true nature of these events. “Massages” were often one-on-one sessions that served as an entry point for abuse, as victims like Virginia Giuffre have testified. “Dinners” were social gatherings designed to groom and normalize the presence of young women alongside high-profile individuals. And “parties,” well, those were often explicitly transactional, with young women flown in with an expectation to provide “services.” It’s an awful situation.
Trump’s use of the word “spa” also seems to point to something of a double meaning. It makes one wonder, in the context of Epstein, what kinds of “massages” were being offered at Trump’s establishment. The fact that Trump has admitted to hiring children for “spa staff” is an indictment. The situation makes him complicit in a pattern of sexual assault and trafficking.
The details coming to light confirm this. Trump appears to view women as property, especially younger women, which further fuels the gravity of his involvement. It seems as though, for him, the fact that Epstein “stole” his staff is a bigger offense than what those staff members might have gone through. It also seems that, in 2002, Trump declared Epstein to be a “terrific guy” who loved women as much as he did. This speaks volumes about what he knew and what he condoned.
The fact that some of the language being used by Trump and his associates is so revealing. It’s a pattern of grooming, exploitation, and trafficking. This isn’t just about a bad friendship or an unfortunate business deal; it’s about the exploitation of vulnerable young women, and it all began at Mar-a-Lago. In the end, the situation reflects the sad truth: Trump is a pedophile and a sex trafficker who enabled these crimes.