By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During an interview, the interviewer inquired whether some of the employees taken from the spa were young women. Trump confirmed that Epstein took employees, specifying that the individuals taken were from the spa. Trump stated that he became aware of Epstein’s actions and told him not to take any of his employees.
Read the original article here
Trump Says He Ended Friendship Because Epstein “Stole” Victim From Him
The very notion that Trump ended his friendship with Epstein because he “stole” a victim is a deeply disturbing one, isn’t it? It’s almost as if the real story here is buried under layers of denial and deflection, which, to be fair, is often the case when discussing these individuals.
For a start, consider the timeline. We’re told that Epstein supposedly “stole” someone in the year 2000. Yet, a couple of years later, Trump was still on the record praising Epstein as a “terrific guy.” This clearly suggests that whatever caused the supposed rift, it wasn’t the initial incident. This begs the question: what was more important than the well-being of the supposed victim?
And let’s be clear: Trump is talking about someone who was trafficked, a real victim of abuse. The language itself – “stole a victim” – is appalling. It frames a human being as property, something that can be taken away. It’s the language of a slave owner, not a concerned friend. The very audacity of casting himself as the injured party, the one who was wronged, is a chilling reflection of a narcissistic mindset.
It’s also important to note the context. We’re talking about a situation where a young person was allegedly working in a spa at Mar-a-Lago. This fact alone demands scrutiny. What was a 16-year-old doing in that environment? What kind of vetting was in place? These are essential questions that deserve serious answers.
Then there’s the whole idea of ending a friendship because someone “stole” someone else. Wouldn’t a more appropriate response to learning about human trafficking be to immediately report it to the authorities? This is the crux of the problem; Trump’s reaction and his apparent concern for the victims seems to be non-existent.
It’s a stark contrast to what a normal person would do. If a friend stole your wallet, you might end the friendship. But if that friend trafficked a young woman, the proper response would be to contact the police. The lack of this basic moral compass is, frankly, frightening. It’s the equivalent of watching your house flood, and instead of calling for help, you frantically try to stop the water with your bare hands.
The whole narrative is riddled with contradictions. Trump’s words and actions don’t align, to say the least. He can’t seem to keep his story straight, but then again, he seems to have no qualms about saying one thing and doing another. The whole thing stinks of someone who doesn’t care about the victims, but more about the damage to his public image. It is important to note that Trump likely knew of the victims’ whereabouts well before the public.
The details are also suspect. There’s talk of a “rift” between two “slave masters,” and accusations of Trump ordering Epstein’s death to silence him. While these claims are serious and need to be addressed, they are the extreme end of what has been alleged.
The situation demands transparency. The public needs to know the full extent of the relationship between Trump and Epstein, and what, if any, role Trump played in Epstein’s activities.
Ultimately, this whole situation is a case study in twisted priorities and a warped moral code. Trump’s words and actions reveal a mindset where the well-being of others, especially women, is secondary to his own ego. It’s a deeply disturbing picture of a man who seems to view human beings as commodities to be controlled, and the language used is indicative of someone who genuinely believes that he is above the law.
The fact that this is even a topic of conversation is a sign of how far we’ve fallen when it comes to having leaders with any kind of integrity. It’s a story that should make us question not only the individuals involved, but also the values we hold as a society.