By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The White House was reportedly thrown into confusion regarding the status of FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino following his failure to appear at work on Friday, which fueled speculation about his resignation. Aides reached out to CNN seeking clarity on Bongino’s employment status as his relationship with the administration had deteriorated, and the president was reportedly angered by Bongino’s threats to quit. This uncertainty was further compounded by the president’s ambiguous response when asked if Bongino was still in his post. Bongino’s potential departure stemmed from his frustration with the DOJ and FBI’s findings regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death.
Read the original article here
Trump Aides Forced to Text CNN: Has Dan Bongino Come Into Work Today? is a truly bizarre situation, isn’t it? It’s just wild to imagine high-ranking officials within the Trump administration, people with access to classified information and presumably a lot of resources, reaching out to a news outlet, a source they’ve spent years denouncing as “fake news,” to find out if a key colleague even showed up for work. That alone speaks volumes about the chaos and uncertainty that must have been swirling around the White House, particularly during this specific period.
The core of the confusion seems to be centered around Dan Bongino, who was, at the time, the deputy director of the FBI. The fact that his absence from the office, specifically on a Friday, sparked such panic is quite telling. It suggests that Bongino’s presence, or lack thereof, had a significant impact on the administration. The fact that he didn’t show up Friday morning is something. It points to something more than just a simple case of a missing employee. The implications could range from a personal issue to something far more serious, such as an impending scandal or a possible resignation.
The elephant in the room, as many people seem to be pointing out, is the Epstein scandal and the potential involvement of high-profile figures. The fact that aides were scrambling for information about Bongino in relation to this scandal, suggests that there was a sense of unease and a desire to understand what was happening within the FBI and its relation to the Epstein case. This is especially true as there is a potential cover-up. This also highlights a disturbing lack of internal communication and trust within the administration itself.
One of the more interesting takeaways is that Bongino seems to have fought for this position. This adds another layer to the story. Some might suggest that this position would be very different for someone whose job was to be the mouth piece for certain parties. Bongino went from talking about the issues to being in the issues, so to speak.
The shift in his demeanor, from a fervent supporter of Trump to potentially contemplating resignation, is striking. People who knew him seem to notice this. Again, the fact that someone would suddenly want to quit a high-profile, well-paying position raises serious questions. It suggests a profound shift in his perception of the situation, potentially indicating something he was privy to, or that he had access to classified information or was concerned about being implicated.
The episode has several other intriguing aspects. The fact that the administration was seeking clarity from CNN, a news organization routinely criticized, shows a level of desperation and a breakdown of trust within their own information channels. It’s a bit like asking the enemy to tell you what’s happening inside your own camp. The comments about federal workers and their accountability, and the comparisons to being “AWOL,” also provide a valuable perspective.
The Epstein case and all of the drama surrounding it definitely amplified this situation. The focus on the existence of the Epstein list and its potential impact on the administration’s reputation is also worth noting. This point underscores the pervasive atmosphere of suspicion and fear that likely permeated the White House during this time. It suggests that the administration knew there was a crisis on the horizon.
The commentary also highlights the potential for hypocrisy and the allure of financial gain. Some people suggested that Bongino might have been more interested in the money and the status quo than in upholding the principles of his office. The comments on his potential return to podcasting and the “pragmatism” of not having money reveal a cynical view of the situation.
All of these elements combine to paint a picture of an administration in disarray. The need to contact CNN is something. It reveals the lack of effective internal communication, the fear of scandal, and the potential for high-profile resignations. The details about the Epstein case and the lack of action within the FBI, and Bongino’s possible reactions, give us a sense that the wheels of justice may have been turning in some very strange ways.