By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump administration, under the direction of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, released over 230,000 pages of documents concerning the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., fulfilling a promise to declassify files related to assassinations. This move, coordinated with various government agencies and touted by officials as a commitment to transparency, comes in the wake of continued public interest in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The release of the MLK files has not satisfied public demand for information on the Epstein investigation, which remains a major point of focus. Critics have expressed frustration, with many online expressing a desire for the release of the Epstein files instead of the MLK documents.
Read the original article here
Anything But Epstein: The release of thousands of MLK Jr. assassination files by the Trump administration has certainly ignited a firestorm of reactions, mainly centered around the persistent demand: “Where are the Epstein files?” The internet, in its collective wisdom, seems to be echoing this sentiment, perceiving the move as a calculated distraction tactic, a “look over here!” moment designed to divert attention from the elephant in the room—or rather, the scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein and the alleged network of powerful individuals. The common thread is the frustration and suspicion that the administration is intentionally shielding something, and that “something” is inextricably linked to the Epstein case.
The undeniable frustration, echoed across various comments, stems from the perception that this is just another move in a larger game of smoke and mirrors. The timing of the MLK file release, the specific focus on historical documents, and the complete silence on the Epstein files fuels the growing belief that the current administration is trying to control the narrative and manipulate public perception. The consensus is that while the MLK files may be of historical interest, they are seen as a blatant attempt to deflect from a much more pressing and arguably more relevant issue involving potential crimes of the administration.
The prevailing feeling is that the release of the MLK files, while possibly beneficial in the long run for transparency, is a blatant distraction from the urgent need for transparency in the Epstein case. Many feel that the administration’s continued avoidance of the Epstein files serves as a de facto admission of guilt, solidifying the perception that the contents of those files are potentially damaging and implicating the president in something sinister. The implication is clear: if the administration was truly interested in transparency, the Epstein files would be the first to be released.
The accusations are bold and direct, questioning the president’s motives and integrity, suggesting that the administration knows something about the Epstein case that it desperately wants to keep hidden. This perspective sees the MLK file release as a calculated move to manipulate public opinion and distract from the elephant in the room.
The prevailing mood across the comments is one of disbelief and cynicism. The general consensus, it seems, is that the Epstein files are being deliberately withheld to protect key individuals, and that this move is a betrayal of the public trust. There’s a feeling of being played, of being led on a wild goose chase while the real story is being buried. The repeated questions about the Epstein files reveal the core belief that the administration is hiding something significant.
The public’s outrage is further fueled by the sense that the administration believes the public to be easily misled. The sentiment is that the administration is treating its voters as naive, assuming they’ll simply accept the distraction without questioning the underlying motives. The insistence on releasing anything but the Epstein files is viewed as an insult to the intelligence of those demanding answers.
This collective assessment of the situation suggests that the administration’s actions have backfired. The public’s anger and suspicion, far from being assuaged by the release of the MLK files, have been amplified. The MLK files have become a symbol of this administration’s unwillingness to address the Epstein case head-on.
There’s also a palpable frustration that the administration seems to be prioritizing its own interests over the demands of justice and transparency. The sense is that the Epstein files are being kept under wraps because they contain damning information about the president and his associates. The MLK file release is now seen as part of a larger pattern of obstruction, aimed at covering up wrongdoing.
It’s clear that the central question is whether the administration will finally release the Epstein files. This single issue overshadows any other development, casting a long shadow over the administration’s legacy. The longer those files remain hidden, the louder the chorus of criticism will grow, fueled by the underlying belief that the truth is being deliberately suppressed.
The internet’s response is clear and unified: “Anything but Epstein” is the message, and the release of the MLK files is simply not enough. The true test of this administration’s commitment to transparency lies in its willingness to release the Epstein files, and until that happens, the calls for justice and accountability will only grow louder.