By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Contractors involved in the Everglades detention center have been observed illegally covering their logos and USDOT numbers on their vehicles. Photos revealed that companies, including Classic Recycling, attempted to conceal identifying information with tape and cardboard. These actions violate both Florida state law and federal regulations, which require clear display of USDOT numbers on commercial vehicles. The apparent attempt to evade scrutiny follows the facility’s controversial opening, with critics questioning the contractors’ motives and the legality of their actions.
Read the original article here
Trucks Entering Alligator Alcatraz Are Hiding Their Logos, DOT Numbers
The situation involving trucks entering what’s being called “Alligator Alcatraz” is raising significant concerns, primarily centered around the apparent attempts to conceal identifying information. The central issue is that trucks, presumably carrying supplies or providing services to this facility, are reportedly hiding their logos and Department of Transportation (DOT) numbers. This practice is a serious red flag, as it violates regulations and raises questions about the nature of the facility and the activities taking place there.
Covering the DOT number is a blatant violation, potentially leading to the suspension of a company’s commercial license. It suggests a conscious effort to avoid accountability and transparency. This deliberate obfuscation fuels suspicion and points towards a desire to keep the transportation of materials and personnel to the facility under wraps. The fact that these companies are willing to risk such violations speaks volumes.
The level of cover-up seems to be poorly executed, as some logos and names of the involved transportation companies can still be seen. This is a clear indication that someone made the deliberate choice to obstruct visibility. The ease with which these companies can potentially be identified reinforces the notion that these actions are not necessarily the acts of a professional enterprise, but are driven by a deeper purpose.
The facility itself is being described in increasingly charged terms, with comparisons drawn to concentration camps and even death camps. These comparisons are, needless to say, very strong and are clearly not a simple coincidence. If the facility truly houses something like a concentration camp, it could be a grim reality that is very uncomfortable to acknowledge.
The context of the location is further concerning. Building any long-term facility in the Florida Everglades presents logistical challenges. The location of this facility raises questions about vulnerability to natural disasters, especially hurricanes. The very choice of location, coupled with the secrecy surrounding the operations, strongly suggests a deeper plan, which is a cause for unease.
The rationale behind the secrecy surrounding the facility is also being scrutinized. The effort to hide the identities of those transporting goods suggests they are aware of the potential negative implications of being associated with “Alligator Alcatraz.” There is a feeling that the people who are involved realize their current position.
The contractors involved in the construction and operation of “Alligator Alcatraz” are mentioned, including companies like CDR Maguire, GardaWorld, Doodie Calls, Granny’s Alliance, and SLSCO Ltd. The use of these companies, particularly those with ties to political campaigns, has led to heightened scrutiny. The contracts themselves are being considered as a way to bypass standard procurement procedures, with those involved seemingly wanting to bypass transparency.
The idea that the companies and people involved are just doing their jobs doesn’t sit well with the overall sentiment. The moral and ethical implications are being weighed. The choice to participate in potentially harmful activities has drawn a harsh spotlight.
The need for action, in the form of identifying, exposing, and holding accountable those involved, is being emphasized. The desire to reveal the companies’ identities and the nature of their work is strong, echoing historical parallels and fueling public discourse.
The sentiment that this entire situation is a dangerous turning point is strong, pointing toward a darker chapter in the history of the country. The deliberate hiding of identifying information adds another layer of complexity to an already troubling situation.