By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite accusations of treason from some, Senator Ted Cruz has admitted that former President Barack Obama is unlikely to face charges. The admission comes amidst the Trump administration’s attempts to deflect from the Jeffrey Epstein case and after accusations from the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that Obama engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy”. Though potential criminal liability for Obama administration officials is suggested, no evidence of wrongdoing beyond requests for intelligence assessments has been provided. Obama has dismissed the accusations as a “weak attempt at distraction.”
Read the original article here
Ted Cruz Admits Trump’s Fever Dream of Obama Treason Charge Is BS. It seems like even the political winds that typically guide Ted Cruz have shifted, and the resulting sentiment is a resounding dismissal of Trump’s obsession with accusing Obama of treason. The whole affair appears to be nothing more than a politically motivated distraction.
It’s clear that Trump himself understands the flimsy nature of his allegations, and this persistent focus on Obama only seems to resurface when Trump needs a smokescreen for his own legal troubles. It’s pretty evident that this whole line of attack is fueled by personal resentment rather than any genuine legal basis. The complete lack of evidence is, of course, a major sticking point.
The fact that Cruz, a man known for his opportunistic approach to politics, is willing to acknowledge the lack of substance here is pretty telling. It really speaks volumes about how baseless Trump’s claims are, especially since Cruz often aligns himself with whatever position seems most politically advantageous. The silence in the face of claims of actual criminality is deafening.
The constant barrage of “Epstein, Epstein, Epstein” in the background noise reveals what many see as the true motivation behind this distraction. Many believe that it serves to deflect attention from issues related to Jeffrey Epstein and the potential involvement of high-profile individuals, including Trump himself.
It’s also important to remember that Trump’s claims, and the potential for charges against Obama, are further complicated by the legal landscape shaped by Trump and the Supreme Court he helped appoint. The idea of any successful prosecution seems increasingly unlikely, regardless of the allegations themselves.
It is even more interesting when you consider that Cruz might actually have some personal skin in the game here. The refusal to stand up for his own wife when she was attacked by Trump is likely the biggest motivator. The focus on Obama seems to have very little to do with the man himself, and everything to do with how to advance his own position.
It’s also worth remembering that Cruz’s actions often seem to be driven by self-preservation. The prospect of a new administration that might investigate certain connections could explain the need for some distancing.
Furthermore, the constant cries for the “release of the Epstein files” hint at the underlying narrative, which seeks to expose the potential connections of people in powerful positions.
It is all very likely that Cruz, like many of his colleagues, is hedging his bets and trying to distance himself from Trump. This creates an opportunity to re-position themselves as the dust settles after Trump’s potential legal woes.
In the end, what this all boils down to is a deeply cynical political game. It’s a game where personal grievances and political opportunism take precedence over truth, justice, and the pursuit of legitimate legal processes. It’s a depressing reflection of our current political reality.