By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The author questions why the press continues to interview figures like Lindsey Graham, who abandoned his initial criticism of Trump to become an ardent supporter. The article draws parallels to historical contexts, suggesting that interviewing such figures is akin to giving a platform to those who undermine democratic values. The author argues that satirical news outlets and late-night talk show hosts are now more effectively exposing the truth about current political events than traditional media. The piece concludes that while some journalists and publications are holding Trump’s allies accountable, the mainstream press often struggles to do the same.
Read the original article here
For the love of God, please stop interviewing Lindsey Graham. This sentiment, shared by many, is fueled by a sense of bewilderment and frustration. Why, in a world seemingly veering towards an “Idiocracy” reality, do we continue to amplify the voice of a man whose primary function seems to be echoing whatever the current prevailing MAGA sentiment is? It’s a question that gnaws at the heart of our media landscape.
The transformation of Lindsey Graham from a critic of Donald Trump to a devoted, almost sycophantic, supporter is a stark reminder of the chameleon-like nature of some politicians. Remember January 6th, 2021, when he declared, “Enough is enough”? That sentiment evaporated faster than most people can type the word “sycophant”. Now, he’s a golf partner and eager lapdog. What exactly is the appeal of such a figure? Is it that his voters are blind to the reality, or is there something else at play? Each time Graham’s name appears in the news, it’s an opportunity to learn something new, and maybe wish we hadn’t.
The argument that he *has* to be interviewed, because he’s a senator and voters need to know his stance, while seemingly logical, doesn’t hold up in our current reality. If this were a sane country, maybe voters would watch, recognize the sycophancy, and vote accordingly. Sadly, it’s not, and the media platforms that provide him a platform are actively contributing to the problem.
The concept of “Stop making stupid people famous” has been a cry for years. And yet, we’re surrounded by these manifestations of Idiocracy. What are we missing here? It’s entirely possible that the media is intentionally diverting attention. They could be avoiding stories that might upset the powerful people in charge.
We keep seeing the same irrelevant individuals, devoid of anything meaningful to say, parading on the Sunday talk shows. Chris Christie, Newt Gingrich, and others, all seem to lack any fresh insights. They just drone on, repeating the same talking points, as if the media is stuck in a perpetual loop. And if the media can find no one else to interview, why not seek out younger voices who actually have thoughtful, educated opinions to contribute to the conversation?
What purpose does he serve beyond being Trump’s lapdog? It’s hard to fathom. It’s a complete and utter capitulation to the whims of a single individual. Is it that his voters don’t recognize the issue, or are they comfortable with subservience?
It’s the same old story, just recycled, and repeated. It’s a sign of the times, this interview culture. We should recognize this lack of originality as it is, an outdated and irrelevant display of politics. The media might be stuck in its old ways, but maybe there is something we can all do to change the system.
And for some of those seeking an escape, there is another, better timeline, where Graham is an interior designer, away from the political stage. Perhaps in that reality, we would see a different kind of leadership, one based on actual merits.
The constant interviews with Lindsey Graham are not just annoying; they are a symptom of a much larger problem. The fact that he is still being granted a platform reveals a fundamental issue with our media. It prioritizes access over substance, and plays to a political environment. There are so many better options. So let’s demand better. Let’s hold media outlets accountable for the quality of their guests and their focus. Only then will we begin to break free from this cycle of sycophancy and irrelevance.