By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a Fox News interview, Stephen Miller defended the new Florida migrant detention facility, “Alligator Alcatraz,” claiming it isn’t “dehumanizing,” but rather, the entry of undocumented immigrants into the country is. He argued that the facility, located in the Everglades, will house the “worst of the worst” and provide superior care to detainees while also ensuring security. Miller’s assertions come despite data showing a small percentage of detainees have serious criminal backgrounds, with the majority having no criminal history. When asked about Elon Musk’s threats to back primary challenges against GOP members who support Trump’s spending bill, Miller doubled down, stating that opposing the bill would be the same as opposing the deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants.
Read the original article here
Stephen Miller Melts Down Over ‘Dehumanizing’ Alligator Alcatraz Criticism
Stephen Miller, it seems, has once again found himself in the headlines, and not in a way that’s likely to garner him any applause. The trigger this time? Criticism of what’s been dubbed the “Alligator Alcatraz,” a detention facility that has rightly drawn comparisons to concentration camps due to its horrific conditions.
The reaction has been swift and cutting. The president’s alleged delight at the potential for harm to detainees is considered disturbing and unhinged, with many observers calling it a shocking and unacceptable display. Some have taken the position that those who supported the new facility should be removed from the government after a new administration takes over.
The common sentiment is that Miller’s response, a “meltdown,” is par for the course. It’s seen as yet another instance of his predictable pattern of rage and defensiveness, an indication of his inability to handle any form of criticism. Some are even demanding headline writers find other ways to describe his behavior.
The core of the issue is the moral outrage surrounding the facility itself. Comparisons to concentration camps are not made lightly. The conditions of the detention, the potential for harm, and the overall dehumanization of the individuals held there are all considered by many to be deeply troubling and un-American.
The core of the issue is the moral outrage surrounding the facility itself. Comparisons to concentration camps are not made lightly. The conditions of the detention, the potential for harm, and the overall dehumanization of the individuals held there are all considered by many to be deeply troubling and un-American.
The criticism extends beyond the facility itself, with many people drawing comparisons between the new facility and past atrocities. Many question how the US has seemingly allowed these things to take place, and how a society that once swore “never again” has arrived at this point.
The outrage is also directed at Miller’s apparent ability to consistently elicit disgust. Some of the comments reflect on the fact that Miller seems to be in a constant state of rage and hate.
Others focus on Miller’s character and personality, viewing him as a hateful individual who embodies a specific ideology that is now on full display.
Even the facility’s financial aspects, like the high cost of detaining each individual, have drawn harsh reactions, as critics note the irony and the hypocrisy of the situation.
There’s also frustration that Miller’s supporters continue to defend him and the policies he represents, despite the overwhelming evidence of their cruelty and inhumanity.
When asked why Miller would feel this way, the comments express an opinion on the argument that it is Americans’ rights that are supposedly threatened by immigrants, and the general consensus is that Miller’s arguments are disingenuous.