By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The claim that The National, a Scottish newspaper, published a front page reading “Convicted US felon to arrive in Scotland” in advance of Donald Trump’s visit is true. The newspaper’s front page, published on July 25th, included this headline, referencing Trump’s conviction for falsifying business records. This front page was shared on The National’s official X account and was further verified by a video from one of its journalists. The “convicted US felon” description is accurate, as Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts in May 2024.
Read the original article here
Scottish newspaper headline about Trump visit referred to him as “convicted US felon”? Well, it seems the Scots are living up to their reputation for plain speaking, and honestly, it’s refreshing. Imagine a headline directly stating a fact, a truth that many feel has been danced around or obfuscated in certain corners of the media. It’s a bold move, but is it inaccurate? Absolutely not. He is, in fact, a convicted felon, and a significant one at that.
The reactions here seem largely positive, and who can blame them? There’s a palpable sense of frustration with the perceived normalization of Trump’s legal troubles in some parts of the world. People seem to be genuinely impressed and supportive of a media outlet that simply states the reality of the situation. There’s a feeling that the US media, in some ways, hasn’t been as direct or honest in its reporting on the former president’s legal issues.
The sentiment seems to be, “Call a spade a spade.” Why beat around the bush? Why use euphemisms or carefully worded phrases? This is about a former US president, who is now a convicted felon. The simple clarity of that headline seems to have struck a chord. It’s a straightforward statement of fact, unburdened by political spin.
It’s interesting, too, how many people bring up the contrast between how Trump’s situation is handled and how a regular person with a criminal record might be treated when attempting to travel. This contrast highlights what many perceive as the unfairness or double standards in the application of the law. The point is being made that his status would likely have consequences for his ability to travel to a country, or any country, if he were not a former president.
There is a clear emphasis on the legal consequences of his actions. Conviction means conviction, regardless of position, or status. It means certain rights and privileges are no longer available. No amount of political maneuvering or public relations can erase that fact. His criminal record is his legacy.
There is also a notable discussion about how Trump’s presidency affected the United States and its reputation. People are discussing how his actions as president and after as a convicted felon have affected the country’s image.
There’s also a definite recognition that the truth cannot be silenced. Regardless of the legal processes, the facts remain: he was convicted of a felony. That is something that cannot be changed. It’s part of who he is and the impact of his choices.
The idea of normalizing or downplaying the convictions is also very present. There’s an understanding that the press has a responsibility to communicate the truth in a clear and straightforward manner. The title, as they saw it, was factual and not up for debate. It was simply stating the truth of the situation.
The overall feeling seems to be that the Scots are doing it right. They’re using facts to describe reality. They are not afraid to speak the truth. It is a simple headline, but it carries a lot of weight in a world where many perceive media coverage to be overly cautious or unduly influenced by political considerations.
In the end, what this seemingly simple headline illustrates is a longing for honesty, a frustration with obfuscation, and a desire for the truth to be stated plainly, regardless of the subject’s identity or position.