By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Lawrence County School System in Tennessee is implementing a new attendance policy that will no longer excuse absences with a doctor’s note. The policy aims to improve the district’s attendance rate, leading to interventions after three absences and juvenile court referrals for students missing eight or more days. Director of Schools Michael Adkins stated that regardless of doctor’s notes, absences will be considered unexcused, with exemptions for chronic illnesses and other circumstances. Parents like Rebecca Sanchez are concerned about the policy, citing that it could lead to truancy referrals even for legitimate illnesses.
Read the original article here
School district says doctor’s notes will no longer excuse child absences. Right off the bat, this is a policy that sparks a lot of strong reactions. My initial thought? It’s like the district is actively inviting a petri dish of coughing, sneezing students to spread germs. The idea of prioritizing attendance over the health of the students and staff is, well, concerning.
The district’s stated goal seems to be boosting attendance and instilling a work ethic, with the idea that kids need to get used to going to work sick, just like adults. But forcing sick kids into the classroom, regardless of a doctor’s note, feels like a recipe for disaster. It could lead to widespread illness, increased absences down the line, and possibly even legal challenges, especially for immunocompromised students.
I have a real problem with the core logic here. It sounds like the school district is more focused on the *appearance* of discipline than on the actual well-being of the students. They seem to be disregarding the advice of medical professionals and prioritizing a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach that completely disregards individual circumstances and the need for public health.
What’s even more alarming is the fact that this policy seems to be aimed at addressing chronic absenteeism. The data shows a significant percentage of students already missing a lot of school. Instead of exploring the reasons behind these absences, this policy appears to be a blunt instrument, potentially punishing students who are genuinely sick or facing other challenges that keep them away from school. Is this a way to cut down on the chronic absentee problem? What happens when even a few sick kids end up spreading a highly contagious virus?
And the penalties seem harsh. Eight absences and you’re looking at juvenile court? That’s a terrifying prospect for parents and kids alike. It’s a direct pathway into the school-to-prison pipeline, potentially impacting kids who are struggling with health issues or other life difficulties.
Let’s talk about the implications for parents. Suddenly, a sick child becomes a potential legal issue. Parents may feel pressured to send their children to school even when they’re contagious, or to avoid seeking medical care altogether. This policy adds a whole new layer of stress and uncertainty.
I also don’t get the lack of respect for medical professionals. The district seems to be dismissing the importance of doctor’s notes, essentially telling them their professional opinions don’t matter. This is not a good look, especially in a world where trust in medical expertise is already a concern.
The fact that the school district is basically telling doctors not to write notes, it sounds like the district is overstepping its bounds. This isn’t about fostering responsibility; it’s about control, and that kind of control is harmful. If a parent believes their child should stay home, they should have that option.
So what’s the alternative? How can this school district better address absenteeism? Perhaps they could focus on finding the underlying causes of the absences and try to help those children, rather than treating every student as a potential truant. There are ways to encourage good attendance without resorting to punitive measures, like positive reinforcement, incentives, or addressing the systemic issues that keep some students out of the classroom.
Looking at the bigger picture, this policy is a symptom of a deeper problem: the continued underfunding and undermining of public education. When schools are struggling, they may resort to desperate measures like this, that do more harm than good. The long-term effects of this approach could be devastating, impacting children’s health, education, and future opportunities.
In the end, this policy feels like a step in the wrong direction, one that prioritizes discipline over health, and potentially, basic human decency. I would not want to be the person who has to defend this policy when a child with a serious illness suffers.