By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Anthony Scaramucci expressed skepticism regarding the Justice Department and FBI’s memo denying evidence of Epstein’s murder or a “client list.” He acknowledged the possibility of Epstein possessing compromising material on powerful individuals and suggested the timing of the memo’s release during a holiday weekend was suspect. While Scaramucci didn’t believe in a traditional “client list,” he emphasized Epstein’s collection of tapes with compromising information. The former Trump White House Communications Director also discussed Elon Musk’s potential role in a new political movement, suggesting Musk’s intelligence and resourcefulness would outmaneuver traditional politicians.
Read the original article here
Trump’s Epstein Shutdown ‘Doesn’t Smell Right:’ Scaramucci is a sentiment that seems to be echoing across various corners of the internet. It’s a feeling that something is amiss, a sense that the handling of the Epstein files, particularly concerning Trump’s potential involvement, is far from transparent. The timing of certain actions, such as the “no client list” memo being released during a holiday weekend, raises eyebrows, leading many to believe it was strategically timed to minimize scrutiny.
The idea that the release of information is being deliberately delayed or even obfuscated is gaining traction. The missing surveillance footage and the alleged negligence of the guards at the time of Epstein’s death further fuel these suspicions. It creates an environment where a simple denial of a client list feels more like a cover-up than a definitive answer. This is especially true when considering the well-documented friendship between Trump and Epstein.
The core of the issue revolves around the expectations placed on those in power. If the world is questioning a President’s involvement in such a serious matter, the most logical response would be complete transparency. Releasing all files related to Epstein would seemingly be the obvious move to clear one’s name. The absence of this action only strengthens the suspicion that there’s something to hide.
The absence of complete disclosure is also seen as a failure to apply the same standards of scrutiny to this situation as have been applied to other high-profile political issues. Some have compared the lack of attention to the Epstein files with the fervent interest in “her emails,” suggesting a double standard in the media coverage and political responses.
The idea that any files would be released truthfully or unedited is met with skepticism. Given the players involved and the history of manipulation, many doubt the motives and integrity behind any information release. The general consensus is that the information being released is just a smoke screen.
The close friendship between Trump and Epstein further complicates the situation. Given the nature of Epstein’s alleged crimes, it’s difficult to ignore the implications of their relationship. If Trump’s name is mentioned in those files, it would explain the lack of transparency, making it necessary for Trump to deny the existence of a client list and that he knew anything about Epstein’s crimes.
This lack of transparency, the perceived obfuscation of information, and the close relationship between Trump and Epstein are the foundation for the “doesn’t smell right” sentiment that is circulating. The situation has created a lot of distrust and doubt among people regarding Trump’s actions.