By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Russia’s shift to using Iranian-made Shahed drones, and its domestically-made Geran-2 drones, for attacks on Ukraine has created new challenges for air defenses. These cheap and easily modified drones are now used in massive, coordinated attacks, including the use of decoy drones to overload Ukrainian defenses. The Russian army has developed its own manufacturing of Geran-2 drones, increasing the frequency of attacks by up to 800 drones per day. The future of Ukraine is uncertain, as the focus should be on interceptor drones and training military personnel nationwide in their use.
Read the original article here
Russia’s shift to massive waves of drone strikes is a clear indication of evolving tactics in the ongoing conflict. It appears Russia is attempting to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses by sheer numbers and, critically, through the use of deceptive strategies. This isn’t just about launching more drones; it’s about using them in coordinated attacks, potentially employing decoy tactics to saturate and confuse Ukrainian air defense systems. This relentless strategy has put immense pressure on Ukraine, forcing them to expend significant resources to counter these persistent aerial assaults.
A significant concern arising from this strategy is the need for Ukraine to proactively target the drone production facilities. It’s evident that simply reacting to the attacks is insufficient; Ukraine requires the capability to strike at the source, crippling Russia’s ability to continuously generate and deploy these drones. This proactive approach is vital, as passively defending against such a barrage is an uphill battle. The sheer volume of drones being deployed makes it difficult to defend a country, as you cannot cover the entire airspace. The current supply levels of defense, like CIWS for instance, are limited and struggle to provide adequate coverage.
The use of drones also has implications beyond the immediate battlefield, with civilian populations bearing the brunt of the consequences. We’ve seen it countless times already, but these attacks are a clear violation of international laws and, sadly, a disregard for the safety of non-combatants. The intent behind these strikes is often to terrorize the populace and degrade infrastructure, creating a climate of fear and uncertainty.
The effectiveness of different defensive measures is an important factor in this evolving conflict. Countering these slow-moving, prop-driven drones presents unique challenges. While point-defense systems like CIWS on warships are effective at close range, their limited reach and coverage render them insufficient against a widespread drone threat. Moreover, the tactics employed by Russia, such as varying altitudes and utilizing radio modems to analyze the effectiveness of each strike, further complicate the defense.
One crucial point highlighted is the significance of Ukraine developing its own interceptor drone production capability. With the ability to intercept drones at different altitudes, Ukraine could potentially overcome the drawbacks of their current air defenses. This approach would preserve valuable missile resources, allowing for a more cost-effective defense strategy.
A key concern is the escalation of such tactics. The West’s response seems to be hindered by a reluctance to provoke a wider conflict, especially considering the potential nuclear ramifications. It seems the fear of escalation is a major factor in how the West is approaching the issue. The constant threats of nuclear escalation from Russia act as a deterrent, discouraging any decisive action. This restraint, however, is perceived as a form of appeasement that, ultimately, enables Russia to continue its aggression.
The challenges faced by Ukraine are not just military. The economy is under immense strain, further hampered by the need for reconstruction and ongoing defense. The gap between the support being provided and the actual needs of Ukraine remains staggering. Ukraine’s allies must increase their military support, not just in terms of quantity, but also by allowing Ukraine to strike back deep inside Russia. It is becoming increasingly clear that stronger actions are needed to deter Russia.
The complexities surrounding military aid are also a key issue. While financial aid is vital, translating that into effective weapon production and delivery is difficult, especially when facing a massive industrial output from Russia. The production of munitions, and more importantly, the capacity to deliver them at scale, presents its own set of logistical and industrial challenges.
Moreover, the issue of manpower is crucial. Ukraine is facing significant manpower shortages, which highlights the limitations of relying on defensive measures alone. The need for more assistance, combined with the fear of escalation, poses a challenging dilemma. In essence, there are many obstacles to providing the level of support needed to bring the conflict to an end.
The conversation highlights the challenges of the current approach. The argument is that, while financial assistance is important, the underlying issues of production rates, and manpower are significant obstacles. The belief is that even with significant financial aid, the problems will continue. The need to provide the resources to make up for the loss is the most pressing concern.