By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The recent GOP-led budget cuts, backed by Donald Trump, threaten to significantly reduce funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, jeopardizing educational programming on PBS. This move opens the door for right-wing organizations like PragerU to fill the void, which openly aims to indoctrinate children with conservative ideologies. PragerU is already gaining traction by partnering with states to produce educational materials and is even being promoted by the White House, suggesting a shift in support away from PBS and towards conservative-leaning content. This raises concerns about the future of children’s educational content and the potential for increased political influence in the classroom.
Read the original article here
Propaganda platform PragerU is primed to capitalize on Trump’s PBS cuts, a situation that has many people understandably worried. PragerU, an online platform known for its right-wing propaganda, has made its intentions clear: they want to supplant PBS as a primary source of children’s educational content. This ambition, coupled with the potential for cuts to PBS under a Trump administration, creates a chilling prospect.
PragerU’s content is viewed by many as highly problematic. Critics point to instances where the platform downplays historical atrocities like slavery and the mistreatment of Indigenous peoples. Furthermore, the platform’s founder, Dennis Prager, has expressed views that some find deeply disturbing. The very idea of PragerU becoming a significant provider of educational material for children raises serious concerns about the indoctrination of young minds with a specific, and often controversial, ideological viewpoint.
The fear is not simply about promoting a particular political stance, but also about the potential for historical revisionism and the suppression of critical thinking. The content produced by PragerU, as some people have experienced firsthand, presents a distorted view of history and civics. They claim that civil rights legislation is unconstitutional, which is a radical departure from mainstream understanding. This approach is particularly concerning for young, impressionable audiences, who may not have the critical thinking skills to discern the biases present in the content.
The connections between PragerU and other figures and institutions on the right are also noteworthy. The platform’s CEO is reportedly affiliated with Israel and has ties to the military there, adding another layer of complexity to their overall mission. This interconnectedness creates an echo chamber effect, where the same ideas and values are reinforced across different media platforms and educational institutions. This can be detrimental to any society when one viewpoint is pushed through and dominates the national discussion.
The potential for increased funding for PragerU, in the event of cuts to PBS, is a genuine concern. With less funding available for traditional public broadcasting, there’s a risk that conservative groups will step in to fill the void. Considering the fact that the content PragerU produces is highly biased, this is problematic and harmful to the education system as a whole. This is especially worrisome considering PragerU’s videos are “incredibly damaging if applied for anything other than calling out right wing propaganda.”
The implications of this shift could be far-reaching. Children, as well as the families who support them, are at risk. They may be deprived of a well-rounded, objective education and instead be fed a narrow, ideologically driven curriculum. This could lead to a generation that is less informed, less critical, and less able to engage in thoughtful dialogue with those who hold differing opinions. The solution to this issue is not only to address it at the federal level but also to speak to children about the issues and ideas and encourage independent thinking.