As midterm elections approach, California Governor Gavin Newsom is considering a shift in redistricting policy, particularly if Texas redraws its maps in a way that favors Republicans. Newsom expressed frustration with partisan power grabs, suggesting California may reconsider its “fair play” approach. This follows Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s plans to redraw congressional maps, which could lead to lawsuits alleging discrimination. However, any change in California’s redistricting process would be complex, as the current system is enshrined in the state’s constitution and overseen by an independent commission.

Read the original article here

Newsom floats redistricting retribution if Texas GOP redraws its maps as midterm election approaches. It seems the conversation around this is pretty clear: if Texas Republicans, in their efforts to maintain power, are going to redraw their congressional maps in a way that’s perceived as unfair or discriminatory, then California, under Governor Newsom, should consider using the same tactics, even if it means gerrymandering. The consensus? It’s time to fight fire with fire.

The core sentiment here revolves around the idea that Democrats have been playing by a set of rules that Republicans simply aren’t adhering to. There’s a sense of frustration that Democrats are consistently losing elections, at least in part, because they’re unwilling to utilize the same aggressive strategies as their opponents. The feeling is that if Republicans are willing to cheat, then Democrats should feel justified in doing the same to even the playing field. This includes the suggestion that California, and potentially other blue states like New York and Illinois, should redraw their maps to create as many safe Democratic districts as possible.

There’s a bluntness to the calls for action: “Do it,” “Just do it,” “Fight fire with fire,” are the refrains. The rationale boils down to self-preservation. Many argue that if the Republicans are openly flouting the rules, then the Democrats are essentially handicapping themselves by not adopting a similar approach. The focus is on regaining control of Congress, and the belief is that gerrymandering, while perhaps ethically questionable, is a necessary evil in the current political climate.

The urgency surrounding the midterm elections is palpable. The idea is that these maps need to be redrawn *now* and that waiting is detrimental. The fear is that by the time the legal challenges run their course, it will be too late. The perception is that Republicans are willing to play dirty, and the Democrats need to respond in kind to preserve democracy.

However, some comments acknowledge the complexities of Newsom’s ability to do this in California. California has passed propositions that seemingly prevent gerrymandering, but that isn’t stopping the push for action. The frustration is directed at the slow-moving pace and ethical considerations the Democrats face.

There’s a clear understanding that these actions could potentially face legal challenges, but the overwhelming attitude is that these challenges should be ignored. The belief is that the courts will likely favor the Republicans anyway, and that any attempt to stop them is pointless. This is based on the idea that the Supreme Court might not be fair to Democrats.

The discussions show a willingness to fight for power and to utilize any means necessary to counter what is viewed as a Republican attack on democracy. The overall sentiment is one of desperation: a feeling that the stakes are high and that the time for niceties is over. It’s a call to do whatever it takes to win and defend the country.

The call for a more aggressive approach isn’t limited to California. There is an expressed hope that other blue states like New York and Illinois will follow suit. There’s talk of withholding federal taxes and fighting aggressively against the other party.

Ultimately, the comments reveal a sense of anger and frustration. There is a desire to fight back against perceived Republican tactics and to finally take off the gloves. The sentiment boils down to a simple, powerful message: if the Republicans are willing to gerrymander to gain power, then the Democrats should be willing to do the same.