By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Guardian’s analysis of legal proceedings following law enforcement actions in Los Angeles reveals a disturbing pattern of misconduct. Prosecutors were forced to dismiss numerous felony charges against protesters, many of which relied on inaccurate reports and misrepresented video evidence. These reports from Department of Homeland Security agents contained false statements about the sequence of events and even misidentified defendants. This incompetence extends to the top, as the U.S. Attorney for LA has not publicly acknowledged the dismissal of these felonies.
Read the original article here
New Evidence Shows That Los Angeles Protesters Were Arrested Based on Lies | The city’s occupation was nothing more than an authoritarian dumb show. The truth is, the narrative around the Los Angeles protests was dramatically skewed, a classic example of how easily propaganda can be disseminated and how readily it can be consumed. The core of the issue lies in the blatant misrepresentation of events, with authorities seemingly manufacturing reasons to arrest protesters and the media amplifying this manufactured chaos. The scale of the protests was greatly exaggerated, creating an image of widespread destruction and anarchy that simply didn’t exist. This distortion served a clear purpose: to justify an authoritarian response and to demonize the protesters themselves.
The manipulation of the situation seems to be a calculated effort. The tactics employed were reminiscent of a poorly-acted theatrical performance, a “dumb show” designed to shock and awe. The reality on the ground contrasted sharply with the media’s portrayal. While one street downtown might have experienced some disruption, the rest of the city functioned normally. This stark contrast highlights the deliberate exaggeration used to create a false narrative of a city under siege. Photos and videos were cherry-picked and strategically released to fuel fear and outrage, which was then skillfully exploited by certain political factions for their gain.
The evidence strongly suggests that the arrests were based on lies. The claims made about the protesters were often unsubstantiated and contradicted by the actual events. It’s clear that the authorities were not simply maintaining order but actively seeking to suppress dissent and silence those who were protesting. The use of misinformation and outright falsehoods to justify these arrests reveals a disturbing pattern of abuse of power. The goal was clear: to scare citizens, to control the narrative, and to create a pretext for an aggressive response.
The media played a pivotal role in amplifying the misinformation. Some news outlets, particularly those aligned with certain political ideologies, actively participated in spreading the false narrative, often repeating the same footage over and over, creating the illusion of constant unrest. This sensationalized coverage served to manufacture a sense of crisis, leading to a distorted view of reality for many viewers. The constant loop of the same images, such as a single burning car, was a particularly effective method of manipulation, designed to create a sense of panic and reinforce the false narrative of a city on fire.
The contrast between the reality of the protests and the media’s portrayal is striking. Many people who lived in or near the protest areas reported that life continued as normal, except for the areas where the police were causing trouble. Yet, the dominant narrative portrayed a city in chaos, which led to the unnecessary fear and apprehension, reinforcing the propagandistic nature of the coverage. Friends and family from out of town were contacting residents, worried about their safety, based on the sensationalized reports they’d seen. The media’s failure to correct the record and apologize for the misinformation perpetuated a climate of distrust.
This type of sensationalism mirrors the formula used by news channels, with their constant focus on fear-mongering and ratings. The constant drumbeat of negativity, of a city on the brink of collapse, had a palpable effect, and it reveals how easily the public can be manipulated by those who control the flow of information. The strategy is well-worn: create a crisis, instill fear, and then present oneself as the only solution. It is a playbook that has been used repeatedly throughout history to justify authoritarian actions.
The fact that the narrative persists, that people still believe the exaggerated accounts of the protests, speaks volumes about the effectiveness of the propaganda. This manipulation is especially effective when paired with a consistent message over a long period of time. This constant onslaught of negativity is designed to erode trust in institutions and to make people more susceptible to believing extreme claims. The lack of honest reporting, the failure to provide context, and the deliberate distortions of facts all contribute to this troubling trend.
This case demonstrates how the media’s sensationalism is often used in concert with authorities, revealing an abuse of power and a deliberate effort to manipulate public perception. This raises serious questions about accountability and the protection of civil liberties. When the truth is sacrificed for political gain, the very foundations of democracy are undermined. The fact that this is happening in plain sight, and that it is often met with silence or acceptance, is deeply concerning. The Los Angeles protests were not an isolated incident. It’s a symptom of a larger problem: a crisis of trust and truth in the digital age. It’s a story that needs to be brought to light and remembered.