By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Authorities are investigating a missing grenade from the scene of a fatal explosion at a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department training facility that killed three deputies from the arson and explosives unit. The blast occurred while the deputies were handling two “military-style” grenades; one detonated, and the other is unaccounted for. Despite extensive searches of the area, including vehicles and offices, the missing grenade has not been located. Sheriff Robert Luna has initiated an independent review of the unit’s practices and has implemented changes to the handling of explosive devices.
Read the original article here
A grenade is missing from the scene of an explosion. This immediately sets off alarm bells, doesn’t it? The very idea of a missing grenade after an explosion is unsettling. Logic dictates there were initially two grenades involved, and one detonated. The other? Well, that’s the mystery.
It’s natural to wonder why this wasn’t standard procedure before. The fact that future devices, regardless of their inert state, will now be treated as live explosives suggests a shift in protocol. Perhaps the initial assessment of the situation, and the handling of the explosives, wasn’t as thorough as it should have been. Were the individuals involved not properly trained? It’s an uncomfortable possibility.
Considering the situation further, cameras seem like an obvious requirement. In any scenario, and particularly in explosive situations, a recorded account can be invaluable. The lack of this type of oversight raises questions about the context of the events. Is the missing grenade the one that exploded? It’s a reasonable assumption, but the uncertainty makes it even more concerning.
Looking back, it feels like there may be more to the story than what’s being revealed. It does seem a bit strange that the authorities are openly admitting they might not have collected all the evidence. This, depending on the situation, could possibly be construed as an attempt to cover up something more serious. It’s easy to think something truly terrible happened.
The speculation is now running rampant. If they are willing to publicly announce they don’t have the competence to collect all of the evidence, it is a worrying thought. One might assume that it exploded. It also creates the image of a poorly-trained team handling something very dangerous.
Now, let’s consider how these events are perceived from a professional standpoint. As a former EOD tech, for example, the whole scenario is baffling. The lack of clarity and the potential for missteps raises valid concerns about training and competence. The rules of handling explosives are designed to prevent accidents, and every step of the process is critically important.
Police departments seem like they are not adequately equipped to handle explosive situations. There are some incidents reported in the media that confirm this. So, what happened here? It’s difficult to say without a complete picture, but the fact remains: a grenade is missing. The fact that there were two grenades, and that one detonated, only intensifies the mystery.
Perhaps the missing grenade was propelled outwards by the force of the explosion. It is also possible that the second grenade detonated as well. There could be more options as well. But this is also a head scratcher.