By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Previously staunch supporters within the right-wing online sphere are now publicly criticizing Donald Trump. Prominent figures like Joe Rogan, Andrew Schulz, and Tim Dillon are expressing disillusionment with Trump’s policies, particularly regarding immigration, broken campaign promises, and the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. These influencers are questioning Trump’s commitment to his “America First” platform, with some, like Schulz, even suggesting that the Democratic Socialists may better embody those ideals. This shift in sentiment appears to be fueled by frustration over perceived betrayals and perceived cover-ups, particularly regarding the Epstein files, leading some to openly question Trump’s integrity and his supporters’ unwavering loyalty.
Read the original article here
The ‘Manosphere’ Starts to Turn on Trump: The shift is palpable, even if it’s still in its early stages. The Joe Rogan Experience, a cornerstone of the manosphere’s influence, featured Rogan himself expressing a surprising level of distrust towards the Republican party, and a day later, Schulz echoed the sentiment. These voices, once cheerleaders for the former president, are now openly questioning his actions and, by extension, the foundations of their own belief systems. This departure from the usual script has sent ripples through a community that had, until recently, been staunchly supportive of Trump.
This burgeoning disillusionment is, in part, fueled by specific policy disappointments. Figures like Schulz, who had initially voted for Trump hoping for an end to foreign entanglements and budget cuts, now openly express feeling betrayed. The reality of escalated wars and a burgeoning federal budget stands in stark contrast to their initial expectations, creating a rift between their hopes and the actual outcomes of Trump’s presidency. This betrayal of their core beliefs has ignited a sense of frustration, making these younger voices less willing to blindly follow the party line.
Beyond the policy failures, the Manosphere’s discomfort also seems to be growing due to Trump’s personal behavior and perceived moral failings. Trump’s association with figures like Jeffrey Epstein, and the controversial things he’s said about women and even his own daughters, are now being openly discussed. It’s a dramatic shift from the previous tendency to ignore, or even justify, these aspects of Trump’s persona. The once-unquestioning acceptance is gradually replaced with a more critical eye, as the community grapples with the implications of their past choices.
There is a strong undercurrent of cynicism regarding the motives of influential figures within the Manosphere. The accusation of grifting, the pursuit of financial gain through the exploitation of political commentary, is a common thread. The idea that some individuals are more concerned with capitalizing on their audiences than with genuine political conviction casts a shadow over the entire movement. This distrust of the leaders themselves, and the increasing focus on personal wealth and influence, undermines the cohesion and purpose of the Manosphere.
This presents an intriguing opportunity. With this shift, there’s a chance to have a real discussion. The Manosphere’s leaders, like Bongino, will try to pivot to new opportunities. There’s a willingness to welcome people with new ideas instead of the “I told you so” attitude. There is an opportunity to persuade them to consider new viewpoints and have them actually start to consider new viewpoints, to change their minds.
The irony isn’t lost on some observers. The same podcasts that championed Trump are now facing scrutiny. It is difficult to see how these people could have gained so much influence. Despite their “I did my own research” claims, they were ready to accept any lie. But, if one good thing comes out of this, it is that these voices will no longer be blindly trusted, and people are free to form their own opinions.
The situation is not lost on those who have seen this coming for a long time. It seems like we have been hearing the same criticism for years, and the core group of supporters stays in line. The idea that Trump has “crossed the line” is not new; it’s been a recurring narrative for a decade. As before, these people will endorse the next candidate and push the idea on to their million of listeners.
However, there is a widespread sentiment of, “What now?” The Democratic party needs new leadership and messaging. It’s an opportunity to encourage this change and try to influence their worldview. Many in the manosphere revel in ignorance. Instead of learning, they demand that you respect their uninformed opinions. Despite the frustration, there’s some acknowledgment that it is good that this particular niche is figuring it out.
There is some hope in the fact that it is possible. These people who have spent years getting influence can be swayed to a new position. It’s important to welcome them and have healthy conversations with people who may be now more open to changing their minds. It’s all about getting these people to see the light.