MAGA Republican’s Denials: “Not Trump’s Bitches” While Voting for Harmful Budget

The proposed tax break on tips, while seemingly beneficial, is presented as a potential issue when considered within the context of other budget cuts. The $25,000 cap on tax-free tips and the overall implications are not ideal. These perceived savings are offset by reductions to essential programs like SNAP, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act, which disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Furthermore, the article highlights that many tipped workers already benefit from standard tax deductions, minimizing the impact of the proposed provision for those who need it most.

Read the original article here

MAGA Republican Falsely Claims They’re Not Trump’s “Little Bitches”

This whole situation is just brimming with irony, isn’t it? The very act of vehemently denying that you are someone’s “little bitch” often serves as the most damning proof. It’s like the old saying, “Methinks the lady doth protest too much.” When a Republican Congressman, specifically Derrick Van Orden, vehemently insists he’s *not* Trump’s, well, you know, the immediate thought is: “Oh, really?”

Derrick Van Orden’s denial becomes even more comical when you consider the context. He’s reportedly about to vote “yes” on a budget bill that’s going to leave thousands of his own constituents without healthcare. He’s essentially prioritizing loyalty to Trump above the well-being of the people he supposedly represents. This is textbook “little bitch” behavior. He had the audacity to say, “We’re not a bunch of little bitches around here, okay? I’m a member of Congress.” You’re a member of Congress *because* you’re playing ball, sir.

It’s not just about one bill or one vote. It’s about the larger pattern of behavior. Republicans, as a whole, seem to be marching in lockstep with Trump. They’ve stood by him through scandals, investigations, and impeachments. They’ve echoed his rhetoric, defended his actions, and embraced his policies, regardless of how detrimental those policies might be. To any outside observer, this unwavering fealty sure *looks* like the actions of, well, you know. The language used to describe this situation has been on point, and a lot of people agree on this.

The headlines writing about this are on fire, and for good reason. The media has often tiptoed around the more unflattering aspects of this dynamic, but increasingly, the gloves are off. It’s a refreshing shift to see honesty and bluntness applied to the situation.

It’s worth noting that the budget bill in question, which Van Orden is supposedly supporting, will have a devastating impact on health care access in his own state. The fact that he’s willing to vote for this, despite the negative consequences for his constituents, just reinforces the notion that loyalty to Trump trumps all else.

This isn’t just about politics; it’s about a fundamental lack of self-respect. The fact that so many elected officials seem willing to sacrifice their own autonomy and integrity in service to Trump is truly astounding. Van Orden’s protestations seem so flimsy, they’re almost comical.

Let’s be honest, if you have to vocally deny being someone’s “little bitch,” you’ve probably already lost the argument. Actions speak louder than words. Van Orden’s actions, and those of many other Republicans, speak volumes. The question isn’t whether they are or aren’t Trump’s “little bitches”, but why they seem so hell-bent on proving it.

When you read these comments and consider the whole situation, it is almost impossible to avoid the conclusion. It’s a perfect example of how the desire for power, and fear of retribution, can turn politicians into something… well, you know.