On July 13, 2025, French President Emmanuel Macron addressed military leaders, revealing a plan for 6.5 billion euros in additional military spending over the next two years, citing unprecedented threats from Russia, terrorism, and cyberattacks. This will bring France’s annual defense spending to 64 billion euros by 2027, doubling the amount from his initial presidency. Macron emphasized the need for a powerful France to protect European freedom, due to instability from the war in Ukraine and uncertainty regarding the United States’ role. The President also initiated a strategic dialogue with European partners to discuss the role of France’s nuclear arsenal in defense.

Read the original article here

France’s Macron calls for a major hike in defence spending, echoing sentiments that are unfortunately becoming rather familiar these days. It’s a strong statement, and the core of his message, “To be free, we must be feared,” is a provocative one. It’s a concept that immediately brings to mind classic political philosophies, like Machiavelli’s, where power and influence are often equated with the ability to project strength, even intimidation.

The idea of increasing military spending naturally sparks debate. On one hand, it’s seen as a necessary step in a world where geopolitical tensions are clearly on the rise. There’s a prevalent feeling that the international landscape is shifting, and that perhaps we are already engaged in a conflict, one we have failed to adequately prepare for. If that’s the case, then bolstering defenses is a pragmatic response, a way to safeguard national interests and potentially deter aggression. The phrase “Si vis pacem, para bellum” (if you want peace, prepare for war) comes to mind, an age-old adage that seems increasingly relevant.

On the other hand, the idea of striving to be feared is not exactly a warm and fuzzy concept. Wouldn’t it be better to be respected, to build alliances based on mutual understanding and trust, instead of trying to instill dread? Macron’s words might be a reflection of the harsh realities of the current world, but at the same time, they could also fuel a cycle of escalation. Relying on fear alone, as the old saying goes, can backfire and even lead to a situation where you become the very thing you are afraid of.

This brings us to the critical question of where the money for this “major hike” is going to come from. It’s not a simple matter, of course. Military spending has significant economic implications. It can drive innovation and create jobs, but it also has the potential to divert resources away from other essential areas like social security, public services and education. The financial considerations aside, it’s also worth noting that France has a substantial arms industry that would obviously benefit from increased defense spending.

The timing of this announcement is interesting. It’s Bastille Day, a national holiday, a time for celebrating national identity and strength. The need to project strength and solidarity is heightened, and the call for increased military spending likely resonates with a sense of patriotism. But, it’s also a time when questions must be asked about the balance between national security and individual liberties.

The conversation surrounding this has also expanded into the broader view of the current global situation. There is a growing belief that we are entering or are already in a period of large-scale conflict. The invasion of Ukraine is a major point of focus. While some might disagree, a sense of urgency is palpable, an awareness that the situation is evolving, and that appeasement or delays could lead to devastating consequences.

The potential for a wider conflict is concerning. The world’s power dynamics are being reshaped, and alliances are shifting. The implications are serious, and the need for decisive action is being voiced. Many feel that the current strategy is not enough, and that more resources, potentially including “boots on the ground”, will be needed to prevent things from escalating further.

From this perspective, Macron’s call for increased defense spending is not just about France; it is a broader call for Europe to strengthen its own defense capabilities, to be less reliant on allies and to become a more independent force in the world. It’s a complex and challenging situation, and any decision made is likely to have far-reaching and unpredictable consequences.

The conversation then moves to the need to be prepared to defend oneself. This resonates particularly with those who believe in fighting for what they believe in. The call to fight against the right-wing populism that is spreading across the world is also loud.

The world is undoubtedly facing a period of uncertainty. The question is whether a focus on military strength is the only answer. The debate about freedom, fear, and the balance of power will continue.