By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Internal documents obtained by Ukraine’s “I Want to Live” project reveal “catastrophic” losses within Russia’s 41st Combined Arms Army operating in eastern Ukraine. These documents, provided by Russians, detail casualties including over 8,625 killed, 10,491 missing, and 7,846 deserters as of June 1, 2024. The 74th Motor Rifle Brigade, in particular, suffered severe losses, significantly impacting its original size, with other brigades also showing heavy losses. High desertion rates persist, especially among soldiers recruited from penal assault units, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability of Russia’s war efforts.
Read the original article here
Leaked documents claiming “catastrophic” losses in Russia’s 41st Combined Arms Army while fighting in Ukraine provide a stark glimpse into the brutal reality of the conflict. The 41st Combined Arms Army, composed primarily of soldiers from Siberia and southern Russia, appears to be bearing the brunt of the fighting, experiencing losses that, if accurate, are simply staggering. It’s easy to see how these numbers might come across as truly alarming.
The sheer scale of the casualties is hard to fathom. We’re talking about potential losses that dwarf those seen by the US in major historical conflicts like World War II. The speed at which Russia is supposedly losing soldiers, particularly if Marco Rubio’s recent comments are accurate, would be, frankly, an anomaly in modern warfare. This is not just about numbers; it’s about a drain on human life that’s almost impossible to quantify, a generation being sacrificed for what?
The reported casualty figures, with the significant percentage of MIA and deserters, raise crucial questions about the true nature of the losses. How are these classifications being determined? Is it possible that the lines between MIA and desertion are blurred, or is it just a terrible fact of war where the dead are more likely to be accounted for? The details that are leaking out certainly suggest that the situation within the Russian army is far more complex and troubling than any official narrative might suggest.
What’s striking is the apparent disproportionate impact on non-ethnic Russian minorities, especially those from Siberia and Southern Russia. There are reports that Russia is using them as cannon fodder, and the leaked information does lend support to this notion. This reinforces concerns about the nature of the war and its potential long-term implications for Russia’s social fabric. With so much loss, it is difficult to consider the implications of war.
The economic and social consequences of such high losses are also a serious concern. The Russian economy is clearly under immense strain, with sanctions, drained resources, and the ongoing demand for manpower impacting various sectors. There’s talk of a 30,000 troop turnover each month, and it’s a significant number, particularly when you factor in the quality of the replacements. It is evident that the economic cost of the war has reached a critical point.
The ruble’s apparent recovery in value should be viewed with extreme skepticism. A recovered ruble isn’t a clear measure of economic stability. The value of a currency is, at least partially, dependent on its ability to be traded. When economic activity is limited, the value of the currency is also limited. There is a huge number of factors that are involved with economic stability.
Furthermore, the shift towards drone warfare, missile strikes, and reduced vehicle usage is just a strategic pivot and a symptom of an army that is struggling. It’s a sign of innovation and adaptation, but also desperation, and a clear indication of the war’s changing dynamics. It’s clear that Russian forces are forced to evolve their tactics and strategies in the face of mounting pressure.
The potential for post-war instability within Russia, with traumatized veterans, returning soldiers, and a society grappling with vast losses, is another troubling aspect. The potential consequences of adding a large number of individuals with the experience of violence and warfare into the society are hard to ignore, and it may lead to social unrest.
The issue of the West’s commitment to Ukraine is also key. History shows the West has a complicated past with countries. The need for a just peace that includes the return of territory, the return of children, and reparations, is the main long-term goal. Abandoning Ukraine would be a betrayal, and may embolden future belligerents.
Ultimately, the leaked documents, when viewed alongside other available information, paint a picture of a Russian military formation that has faced devastating losses. While it remains too early to definitively state that Russia is losing the war, the evidence points towards a conflict that’s exacting an enormous human, economic, and social toll. The true impact of the conflict is, to be honest, difficult to process.