By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, testimony highlighted the close relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell, and Donald Trump. MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell discussed how Trump’s stance on the Epstein files changed. Specifically, O’Donnell pointed out that Trump has never expressed well wishes to any of Epstein’s victims, only to Maxwell. This detail further underscores the complexities of the case and the associated political implications.
Read the original article here
Lawrence: Trump has never said “I wish her well” to any Epstein victims, just Ghislaine Maxwell. It’s a statement that carries a lot of weight when you consider the context. It’s not just a casual well-wishing; it’s a deliberate utterance, a signal, a nod to someone who, from Trump’s perspective, is in a different category altogether. The stark contrast between his public statements about Maxwell and the silence surrounding the victims is a glaring indicator of his priorities and his mindset.
This “I wish her well” sentiment wasn’t just a throwaway phrase. It was a carefully chosen message, one intended to resonate with a specific individual: Ghislaine Maxwell. This is the core of the matter. It’s almost like he’s speaking a different language when addressing her, a language of understanding, perhaps even of complicity. The victims, on the other hand, are met with silence. This disparity speaks volumes, doesn’t it?
The implication is that Maxwell holds a particular significance in Trump’s world. Given the nature of their association, the comment takes on a sinister hue. It’s like a mob boss sending a message of protection or potential reward. What does “I wish her well” actually mean in this scenario? It can be interpreted as a veiled threat, a warning to keep quiet, to protect those involved, to avoid implicating anyone. It is a promise or a threat of silence. This is a clear example of class warfare, wherein the rich and powerful are protected, while the “poors” are not deemed as worthy of acknowledgement.
The absence of any public expression of concern or well-wishing towards the Epstein victims further highlights Trump’s priorities. It’s a stark contrast that underscores his focus on protecting someone intimately connected to the crimes, as opposed to showing any empathy for those who suffered. This distinction, this silence, is deafening. The victims are invisible, the perpetrators… are remembered fondly.
Trump’s relationship with Maxwell, and by extension with Epstein, has always been a source of controversy. His “I wish her well” is seen as a form of protection, a move to protect the one who was complicit. It’s almost as if he is acknowledging a shared understanding, a bond that transcends the allegations and the accusations. This is a powerful statement in a world of secrets and scandals.
Why did this not seem like a big deal at the time? Possibly because the mainstream media struggles to come to grips with Trump, the news, or both. The phrase itself can be easily dismissed, but within the context of the situation, it takes on a far deeper and more sinister meaning. It’s a signal that he sees things differently, that he is looking out for someone, and that this someone is not the victims.
The phrase “I wish her well” is frequently used by Trump in numerous situations. However, when directed toward Maxwell, it feels very different. The statement is more than a generic platitude; it’s a coded message, a nod to a shared understanding. It says, “I will protect you,” or “I am with you” to those that are complicit.
And what does this imply? It suggests a level of intimacy, a shared history, or a sense of loyalty that overshadows any concern for the victims. This sentiment seems very strange to those that are watching and listening. His reaction is very telling.
The silence directed towards the victims of Epstein is equally telling. There is no similar sentiment, no expression of concern or acknowledgement of their suffering. The lack of empathy further reinforces the interpretation that his true priorities lie elsewhere, and with someone, and not with the victims. That is the point being made here.
So, is this “I wish her well” an idle comment? Absolutely not. This phrase is the equivalent of an acknowledgment of a shared understanding. It signals a connection, a bond, that elevates Maxwell above the victims in the eyes of Trump. This distinction is not one to be taken lightly. It’s a very clear indicator of who matters, and who doesn’t.