By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The FBI under Director Kash Patel has significantly increased its use of polygraph tests, sparking concerns of a growing atmosphere of distrust within the bureau. Senior officials and agents are being subjected to these tests, with questions focused on whether they’ve criticized Patel or his leadership. Agents fear losing their jobs for any negative comments made about Patel or Deputy Director Dan Bongino. This aggressive approach reflects a “vindictive and extreme” shift within the FBI, where some officials have reportedly embraced “snitching” while the use of this testing has lead to layoffs.
Read the original article here
Kash Patel Is Polygraphing FBI Staff to Find Out if They’re Being Mean About Him… It’s hard to believe, but here we are, facing a situation that feels ripped straight from a satire article. The news is that Kash Patel, seemingly not content with his position as the head of the FBI, has decided to delve into the realm of, shall we say, “sensitivity management” by employing polygraph tests on his own staff. The stated aim? To root out any unsavory comments, criticisms, or, heaven forbid, mean words, directed towards him.
The idea of someone using such a discredited practice as a lie detector test to gauge the sentiments of their staff is astonishing. The use of polygraphs in this context is not only scientifically dubious, but also deeply concerning from a morale and leadership perspective. The very notion of employees being forced to undergo these tests, often unreliable in court, to determine if they’ve been “casting aspersions” or expressing negative opinions, paints a picture of an office environment ruled by fear and insecurity, an environment completely antithetical to the values of the FBI.
It makes you wonder what kind of questions are being posed. One can only imagine the scene, with agents being strapped to the machine, facing queries about whether they find the director’s leadership effective or if they’ve ever made a disparaging remark behind his back. It’s reminiscent of a scene from a bad movie, with someone making some light of the situation, “Did you or anyone you know draw the unflattering images of me, Kash Patel, found in the men’s bathroom on the 6th floor? Hmmm… and have you ever heard anyone going around referring to me as ‘Trash Fidel’? Let me remind you agent, this is not a laughing matter! This is serious!!”
This approach to leadership isn’t about fostering respect or building a cohesive team; it’s about control, intimidation, and silencing any form of dissent. It seems like a transparent attempt to identify and punish perceived disloyalty. Many will find this method absurd, and it’s tough to disagree. Considering the FBI’s role in upholding justice and defending the Constitution, this behavior is undermining the trust of the public.
The irony is that such a heavy-handed method only serves to highlight the very problem Patel is trying to solve. If there’s a culture of negativity and criticism, forcing people through polygraphs is hardly a way to address it. A good leader would seek to understand the issues, address legitimate concerns, and foster an environment where people feel comfortable voicing their opinions, even if those opinions aren’t always flattering.
It’s also a huge waste of resources. These are government employees, and to divert their time and energy towards an exercise that is likely going to yield mostly false positives, is an irresponsible way to handle the taxpayers’ money. And the idea that the FBI, with all of its crucial work, is dedicating its resources to this kind of exercise, is frankly, ridiculous.
Furthermore, it is easy to see how this tactic can become a tool for retribution. If the test is considered inconclusive, the results could be manipulated to justify the firing of those who fail to express sufficient enthusiasm. Given the unreliability of the tests, it would be easy to fire someone for something they never did. It is a dangerous precedent to set, but it does not seem that Kash Patel is really concerned with the implications.
One has to wonder, what is the motivation behind this? Is it pure ego, a deep-seated insecurity, or perhaps a desire to stifle any questioning of his decisions and agenda? Whatever the reason, it’s clear that the end result is a weakened FBI, where fear and paranoia reign.
Ultimately, this episode is not just about Kash Patel’s fragile ego; it’s a reflection of a wider problem in a political culture that seems to value blind loyalty and obedience over competence and integrity.