By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A viral video of Vice President JD Vance jogging awkwardly at Disneyland has sparked widespread ridicule and mockery on social media. The 13-second clip prompted users to criticize his running style, with many comparing it to prancing or joking about his physical fitness. While some users joined in on the jokes, others defended Vance, attributing his run to a “dad run” and condemning the online criticism as mean-spirited. This incident highlights the constant scrutiny and online attention Vance faces, regardless of the context or setting.
Read the original article here
JD Vance Mocked After Video Of Him Running Through Disneyland Goes Viral: ‘That Guy Made It Through Boot Camp?’
Okay, let’s dive into this whole JD Vance-Disneyland kerfuffle. The internet, as we know it, had a field day when a video surfaced of Vance… well, kind of moving briskly through Disneyland. It wasn’t exactly a graceful display of athleticism, which immediately sparked a flurry of online commentary, and here’s what the online world had to say.
The core of the commentary seems to center on the irony of a person who served in the military, even if it was a stint in the Navy, looking so… well, un-military-like while attempting to run. The phrase that echoed through the digital space was, “That guy made it through boot camp?” The question implies a disconnect between the image of a military man and the awkward, almost lumbering movement captured on video.
Many people noted a perceived lack of decorum or a general air of unsuitability. The comments ranged from mocking his physique to questioning his overall fitness, creating a perception of Vance being out of place. The criticism wasn’t just about the run; it was about how this portrayal seemed at odds with the public image of someone who served in the armed forces and occupies a prominent political position.
The comments, however, took an interesting turn. Some people found the whole thing rather trivial, questioning the validity of it as news. The consensus was that there were far more pressing issues to address about Vance and his political stances, that people wanted to discuss. To that end, people mentioned his political affiliations, his past actions, and his broader policy views, to name a few.
In response to this, people questioned whether the whole thing was “peak modern journalism” and highlighted that there are many other things “really wrong” with Vance. One comment, for example, suggested that the video was a distraction from the “terrible things the admin is doing right now.” This echoes a common sentiment: that focusing on such a trivial detail, like how someone runs, diminishes the focus on their actual policies and actions.
Of course, there were jokes. The internet is a place where levity often finds a way in. The comments mentioned everything from “JD Prance” to speculation that he was running towards a couch, alluding to his well-known affinity for certain furniture styles. There was also discussion about him potentially “searching for the lost pages of the Epstein Files.” This highlights how the video became a jumping-off point for a variety of commentary.
Despite the comedic and satirical aspects, many people did defend Vance on this specific point. People emphasized that the video showed a man hurrying, as they might have, and that this “isn’t even that stupid.” It was also said that many people have probably done the same thing at some point, and a short hurried walk can be a common experience. People brought up personal experiences with running through the parks with kids, which helped humanize the scenario.
However, the thread seemed to pivot away from any direct support, and more toward the idea that people were simply exhausted by such non-stories. In this case, the negative perception may not have been directed at Vance’s personal action, but at the media itself, for deeming it noteworthy.
The whole incident, from a digital perspective, serves as a microcosm of the current state of online discourse. The clip itself was a minor moment, but the response was immediate and multifaceted. The comments touched on everything from his appearance, to his political views, to the nature of modern journalism. And that, in itself, is a fascinating reflection of how we, as a society, react to the public lives of public figures.