By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Naja Lyberth’s experience of receiving an IUD at age 12 reflects a larger historical issue. Thousands of Inuit girls in Greenland were given IUDs by Danish doctors in the 1960s and 70s, often without consent, leading to potential reproductive health issues. Records indicate that approximately half of fertile women in Greenland received IUDs during this time, contributing to a significant drop in the birthrate. Now, over 100 Inuit women are suing Denmark for $6 million, alleging human rights violations, though the investigation into the matter is still ongoing.
Read the original article here
Thousands of Inuit girls from Greenland were given birth control without consent. This is a story that immediately evokes a sense of outrage, and rightly so. It’s hard to fathom the violation of bodily autonomy that occurred, especially when considering the lack of choice these women had over their own reproductive health. The fact that this happened in the 1960s and into the following years is a stark reminder of a time when women’s rights and agency were often disregarded, and it’s a truly shocking situation.
Records indicate that approximately half of all fertile women in Greenland were given IUDs between 1966 and 1970. This is a staggering statistic, especially considering the potential health risks and emotional trauma associated with such a procedure, particularly when it was done without a person’s knowledge or agreement. The result of this widespread practice was a dramatic drop in the birthrate, effectively halving it, in the former Danish colony. In a place that previously had one of the highest birthrates in the world, this kind of demographic shift raises serious questions about the intentions and motivations behind this practice.
It’s important to understand that the insertion of an IUD, even today, can be a painful experience. For the women who underwent this procedure without consent, the physical discomfort was compounded by a profound sense of betrayal and a violation of their basic human rights. The lack of information, the absence of choice, and the sheer scale of this operation paint a picture of systemic abuse. The fact that many women may have experienced infertility or other health complications as a result is absolutely tragic.
The fact that this story is resurfacing in the news now, with ongoing lawsuits, also sparks a lot of mixed feelings. The timing of it being reported makes one wonder about the motivations of the people presenting it. But whether it’s seen as “old news” or a current outrage, the fact remains: This happened, and it was wrong. The fact that many of those affected are still alive and seeking justice is crucial. The fact that justice has been delayed, and that some of the responsible parties have gone unpunished, only adds to the pain and frustration.
The potential impact on the lives of these women is immense. Imagine the emotional and psychological toll of knowing that your body was manipulated without your consent, that your reproductive choices were taken away, and that your ability to have children, maybe the very thing that made a person whole, was compromised. The fact that many women may have died or suffered severe health problems as a result of this improper and unadvised insertion is heartbreaking.
The question also lingers: How was this possible? The scale of the operation suggests a level of coordination and secrecy that is difficult to comprehend. How could such a widespread practice have gone unnoticed for so long? And how was the implementation of the procedure itself handled? The fact that many women, who would have been regular OBGYN patients, seemed unaware that they had an IUD raises serious questions about communication and trust. Was the practice of not informing women of the insertion just a matter of routine?
The situation in Greenland is a sad reminder of the long and often brutal history of the disregard for indigenous peoples. The idea that it was “cheaper than killing the men, women, and children” shows an appalling lack of respect. This case sadly fits into a pattern of similar abuses around the world. The forced sterilization of minorities, and the blatant violations of human rights, are acts that are hard to forgive.
The fact that the Danish government only launched an investigation in 2023, and that the investigation is still ongoing, only adds to the perception that there has been a lack of accountability and a slow pace in pursuing justice. It’s important to note that the practice itself stopped decades ago, but the impact of this decision echoes through time, affecting the lives of generations.
The article title may be misleading, suggesting the practice is still occurring when it stopped many years ago. Even though the events took place decades ago, this doesn’t diminish the gravity of the offense. The lack of transparency and the delayed pursuit of justice have clearly created lasting damage. It’s essential to view this incident in the broader context of the treatment of indigenous populations and the fight for women’s reproductive rights.