By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to Gallego’s resolution, Mullin objected, claiming it was political theater and would be handled similarly to past investigations targeting Trump, such as the impeachments and special counsels. Mullin’s obstruction suggests an effort to shield Trump from scrutiny, particularly regarding the release of Epstein files, despite the failure to deliver on promises regarding these documents. The focus on President Biden’s non-involvement is seen as a weak argument, as Trump was also a former president during Epstein’s death. By blocking the resolution, Mullin is seen as using technicalities to delay the process and protect Trump.
Read the original article here
GOP Senator Admits He Killed Epstein Resolution to Give Trump “Cover” is a headline that certainly grabs your attention, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of statement that cuts right to the chase, promising a story of political maneuvering and potentially something far more sinister. And let’s be honest, given the current climate, a revelation like this is, sadly, not entirely shocking. The core of the story revolves around the actions of a GOP Senator, allegedly, choosing to bury a resolution related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The motivation, as the headline suggests, was to shield former President Donald Trump from any potential fallout.
The Epstein case, as we all know, is a dark chapter in American history. It involved allegations of child sex trafficking and abuse, and the revelations continue to send ripples through the political and social landscape. The idea that a sitting senator would actively obstruct any investigation or accountability in this case, solely to protect a political figure, is deeply disturbing. It suggests a level of loyalty that transcends ethical considerations and the safety of vulnerable individuals.
The comments surrounding this event reveal a mix of emotions, from disgust and anger to a kind of weary resignation. Many people are expressing outrage, labeling the senator’s actions as “disgusting” and a betrayal of the public trust. The comments highlight the irony of a political party that often champions family values and traditional morality being accused of protecting those who prey on children. The level of hypocrisy seems to be a major sore point for a lot of people.
One recurring theme is the call for accountability. People are demanding that the senator be named and shamed, and that the full extent of their actions be brought to light. There’s a feeling that silence and cover-ups only serve to perpetuate the problem, and that transparency is the only path forward. People seem to recognize that this type of behavior is not just about politics; it’s about protecting those who have been harmed and ensuring that justice is served.
There’s also a sense of frustration directed at the media. Some commenters express the opinion that the media is complicit in creating the environment that allows these kinds of actions to occur. They believe that by sensationalizing stories or focusing on clickbait headlines, the media is failing to address the core issues at hand. The push is toward focusing on the substance of the issue and holding those in power accountable for their choices.
The discussion underscores the profound lack of trust many people have in the political system. There’s a perception that those in power are more concerned with protecting themselves and their allies than they are with serving the public good. The Epstein case, with its dark undercurrents of wealth, power, and abuse, has become a symbol of that distrust, and the news that a senator deliberately chose to cover it up fuels the fire.
This incident is a reminder of the importance of holding our elected officials to the highest standards. It shows how easily political considerations can override ethical principles and moral obligations. It’s a wake-up call, urging us to be vigilant, to demand transparency, and to never allow the pursuit of power to come at the expense of the innocent and vulnerable.