By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Germany will deploy naval ships to the Arctic in response to the growing Russian military presence in the region, according to Defense Minister Boris Pistorius. The Bundeswehr plans to send patrol vessels, along with submarines, patrol aircraft, and frigates, to demonstrate its commitment and address increasing maritime threats. These deployments, scheduled for this year, will also include joint training exercises with allies. This move is part of Germany’s broader effort to strengthen its role in defending the West against Russia, particularly following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Read the original article here
Germany to send naval ships to the Arctic to counter Russia’s military build-up: It seems Germany is stepping up its game in the Arctic, a move that’s got a lot of people talking. The idea is to send naval ships up north, a clear response to Russia’s increasing military presence and activity in the region. The timing is interesting, especially considering the ongoing tensions and strategic shifts happening around the globe.
More the merrier if they are NATO ships: One of the immediate thoughts that surfaces is the importance of international cooperation, specifically within NATO. The sentiment is that if these are NATO ships, it adds more weight and strategic significance to the deployment. An integrated approach, with allies working together, sends a strong message of unity and resolve.
Lots of exploratory and surveying value as the conditions up north change: The changing Arctic environment is offering new opportunities for exploration and surveying. As the ice melts, new routes and resources become accessible. This German initiative presents the chance to gather valuable data and map the evolving landscape, which is crucial for understanding the region’s future.
Putin needs to be in jail: The broader geopolitical implications quickly enter the conversation. Some voices directly link this move to a desire to push back against Russian aggression. The focus extends to individual accountability, with calls for those responsible to face justice. The issue goes far beyond the actions of one person; it points to the need for a lasting solution to the underlying issues.
Ah well, Germany has very limited resources at hand for any credible power projection in the North Atlantic: While the initiative is a bold one, some point out that Germany’s naval resources aren’t exactly massive. Questions arise about the actual impact and capabilities of this deployment in the face of a more substantial adversary.
An integrated NATO command structure for key maritime regions like the Baltic Sea or the Arctic Ocean would be a good idea, though: A natural follow-up is the potential for deeper integration within NATO. A centralized command structure could improve coordination and effectiveness. This is about maximizing the combined strengths of the allied nations.
I would imagine that this German initiative already is part of a greater strategy coordinated by the Allied Maritime Command: This idea underlines the existing framework. This suggests a strategic alignment within NATO, with the German deployment being a piece of a much larger plan.
See Russia? See what you have done? You know what happens when the Germans get a taste of military deployment: The German move is directly tied to Russia’s actions, presenting a clear message: This is the result of your build-up and aggressive policies.
Germany! Germany! Gogogogogo!: The sentiment is about Germany’s historical context, the possibility of renewed military activity, and the anticipation of its future activities.
Wait, we have military ships capable of navigating the Arctic?: The technical aspects of the deployment are a critical question. The conversation highlights the specific capabilities of the German navy, considering the challenges of Arctic navigation and the potential for these assets.
Agent Krasnov fuming: This comment underlines the notion that Russia is feeling the pressure, underscoring the effectiveness of the German deployment.
Why don’t they send their non-naval ships? That’ll do absolutely nothing: Critique of the value of this initiative, expressing doubts about the utility of Germany’s actions, perhaps indicating dissatisfaction with the current state of its naval capabilities.
We’ve been spending the past 40 years making our ships more tech focused than combat focused: The focus moves toward the evolution of the German Navy.
Hell our only active frigates don’t even have ASM focused VLS: Concerns raised about the types of ships deployed and their specific weaponry, which may impact their combat effectiveness.
Which Ships?: The focus shifts to the precise ships that will be deployed and what capabilities they offer.
NATO doesn’t have ships, nato member countries do: A point regarding the structure of the alliance. It emphasizes that the resources belong to the individual member states, not NATO itself.
Putin needs to be in an unmarked grave: The focus, as previously, revolves around the person of Putin, the current Russian leader.
The illusion that one man is whats wrong with russia, will only cause more problems in the future: This broadens the context, and emphasizes that the fundamental issues go far deeper than one individual.
This is bigger than Putin: The focus is on the Russian political system, indicating that replacing the leader won’t resolve the underlying problems.
While yes, the amount of ships in germanys navy is quite “*manageable”*, it has some of the most modern and efficient ships in their class: The German fleet’s relative size compared to others is discussed, along with their potential despite their size.
And when one looks at for example russias de facto efficiency with massive problems on the [Kuznetsov](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_aircraft_carrier_Admiral_Kuznetsov), [Nakhimov](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_battlecruiser_Admiral_Nakhimov) (read that as *the whole Kirov class*, not even to speak of the more or less defenceless [slava class](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slava-class_cruiser)), the whole navy is not just aging but quite literally rusting away: The focus shifts to comparing the German navy to that of Russia, and the efficiency of the respective navies.
China would obviously be the only “real” threat to any naval power for NATO (as long as the US isn’t going even more crazy obviously): The primary threat to NATO is not Russia, but China.
But to this day, it has to be seen if their navy isn’t just a paper tiger and if their ships are as efficient as they want everybody make to think: A note of caution about the military strength of China.
The “*who has more ships*”-kind of thought is really the type of thinking of russian or chinese warfare… “*Just throw people / tonnage at it until it breaks*”. And **especially** in naval warfare, this is pretty shortsighted: Focus turns to the strategic thinking of Russia or China, regarding their naval warfare strategy.
Germany has some of the most modern Frigates in the Baden-Württemberg Class: A closer look at the capabilities of Germany’s ships, particularly the Baden-Württemberg Class frigates.
* which is a frigate only on paper and has much more displacement than their counterparts with the only real disadvantage of having no land strike abilities, since the modern german naval doctrine was never to invade another country and no VLS, which is now, with the planned F-127 Class, also implemented: These ships do not have land strike capabilities, or a VLS system, however, Germany is planning to incorporate these systems in the F-127 Class.
It has the quietest attack submarines (which also are AIP capable) for ASW, recon, covert insertion with the 212 A class: Discussion of German submarines, their capabilities, and their suitability.
And with Sachsen and Brandenburg Class it absolutely is more than capable to perform it’s duty. Especially since it’s role is heavily embedded into NATO and cooperation with other naval powers like France, Netherlands and UK: Germany’s readiness to serve the interests of NATO is discussed.
And yes, as you said, their primary doctrine focus and area of deployment is the Baltic Sea, but that doesn’t mean that they aren’t capable of more. Especially with the planned F-126 and F-127, this will increase further: The focus shifts from the Baltic Sea to Germany’s broader capabilities.
Lets not forget that Russian Marine resources tanked heavily in Ukraine and the little amount of ships they have in the north is comparable to Germanys: This points out that the situation is not as one-sided as it might appear.
The German Navy has three type of ships: frigates (Braunschweig class corvettes counts as honorary frigates), submarines and the tallship Gorch Fock: Details on the types of ships in the German Navy.
Any issues with German ships will be balanced out by the issues of the Russian ships. We just happen to know more about what’s wrong with our ships than about what’s wrong with their ships: Discussion focuses on the awareness of both the strengths and the weaknesses of each country’s naval forces.
The Gorch Fok is probably still a better ship than anything the Russians have left: The point is about the quality of the German ships, with the mention of the Russian ships being substandard.
1 would be enough vs. the russian rust buckets: This is a direct comparison of quality between the ships of Germany and those of Russia.
To be fair, i would bet all my money on one NATO ship vs the entire Russian “army” 😆: This indicates a large lack of confidence in Russia’s military.
The war in Ukraine is a good eye opener to see how badly prepared they were and still are: The performance of the Russian military in Ukraine has led to questions about preparedness.
If I was in a NATO-aligned ship I’d tell my friends I’m in the NAVO: This indicates the importance of international cooperation and solidarity.
That’s correct, but since the NATO countries’ resources are under central NATO command, they are de facto NATO ships, or at least NATO controlled ships: The relationship of ships to NATO command and control is discussed.
Does it really matter? i knows it sounds cruel, but death is always too easy for people like him: Concerns are raised about the actions of the Russian leadership.
I believe there is plenty of space at the bottom of the ocean: A blunt statement about the fate that may await the Russian leadership.
If it’s unmarked how can I piss on it?: The speaker is focusing on the outcome of the Russian leader.
That is why I’m for the dissolution of the Russian Federation into its nuclear components, 20 something republics: Some speakers are calling for the break up of Russia.
Just thinking about the overall bad condition of our military: Some speakers are expressing their concerns about the military.
Defectiv Jets, Helicopter and etc: The focus shifts to the shortcomings of the military.
If they’re Norwegian they would have barcodes because they have to scan-da-navy-in: This points out the different methods of organization.
No they are only under NATO command when specifically under NATO command: The distinction between ships under NATO command and those under their respective national control is established.
Yes, unless conducting a specific NATO operation this is a German operation: The operations of the German naval ships are discussed.
They are not under NATO command but remain under the control of respective countries, nato has more of a coordinating and unifying function: Clarification regarding the relationships between NATO and the individual countries.
Bad! Echo chambers breed extreme thoughts, gotta keep those down! And that’s the moment we become what we hate: The issues surrounding the conversation are discussed, and the potential for negativity to be amplified.
It’s either a normal prison cell or execution by “normal” means: The options are considered.
Once we start torturing for “fun” we lose all moral high ground. Balkanization famously never backfires Spreading shit like this doesn’t help Russians to fix their country and political culture: The conversation turns toward the ethical ramifications.
While this is true pur Navy isn’t that bad: Some speakers are offering opinions on the quality of the German ships.
Those ships are pretty much always under nato command – unless withdrawn from said command by host country. They literally have the nato emblem all over them as the biggest decal on the ship, symbolizing the alliance. They can be both you know, a German ship on a Nato operation: NATO and Germany are closely aligned in this action.
Look into the final hours of Romania’s dictator Ceausescu. He and his wife were executed by the military tribunal. And Romania become modern democratic state with the EU membership afterwards: The point is about the potential outcomes of a regime change.
i never said anything about torture…. letting him live a long life in a shitty prison, comparing to his life now, is much more deserved than just a simple death sentence: The speaker has been misconstrued.
my point is about death sentence being too easy, nothing to do with torture: Clarification of what the speaker had meant.
if you want to be technical about it, imprisonment is a form of torture, just relatively “mild”: Discussion of imprisonment.
False. Unless explicitly participating in a NATO operation they are not under NATO command: The operations of the German naval ships are discussed.
I’m sorry but how is that relevant to the discussion ? They were executed after a trial, they weren’t also tortured because “death was too easy”: The discussion about execution.
You may not have said it but it was heavily implied imo: A claim about the implications of the conversation.
Certain German naval units are permanently assigned to NATO’s command structure. These typically include: Standing NATO Maritime Groups (SNMGs) and Standing NATO Mine Countermeasures Groups (SNMCMGs): Information about Germany’s relationship to NATO is provided.
Learn your stuff: The speaker’s thoughts on the others’ knowledge.
i just explained it to you, what I mean. if you choose to get stuck in your head, and choose what I mean, then I can’t help you: Further discussion and clarification.
Which only consists of **one** German frigate. The vast, vast majority of their navy is not a part of that structure: The extent of the German navy’s assignment to NATO is considered.
You’re being disingenuous as hell: The speaker is speaking with a level of frustration.
I said in my opinion, if you can’t see how differently your comment could be interpreted then you’re playing dumb and I can’t help you: The speaker is speaking with a level of frustration.