By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has accused the Obama administration of a “treasonous conspiracy” to falsely claim Russian interference in the 2016 election, suppressing the truth despite knowing Russia didn’t affect the outcome. Gabbard singled out officials, including James Comey, for allegedly creating a new intelligence assessment that contradicted previous findings. She claims that these officials sought to undermine the will of the American people and usurp the President, calling for investigations and prosecutions. While Gabbard’s announcement was met with skepticism from some MAGA supporters who questioned whether any action would actually result from the allegations.
Read the original article here
Gabbard Feeds MAGA an Obama Conspiracy Amid Epstein Blowback
The immediate impression is that this is a calculated move, a deliberate attempt to distract from the increasingly sticky situation surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and his connections, especially those linked to Donald Trump. The core accusation, that Gabbard is pushing a narrative blaming Obama for something related to Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, feels like a classic bait-and-switch. The focus seems to be subtly shifted away from the immediate Epstein scandal and redirected towards a recycled, less potent controversy.
The crux of the problem lies in the narrative’s selective presentation of facts. The argument seems to hinge on reports that Russia didn’t directly alter vote counts. However, that’s a straw man argument. The investigation wasn’t primarily about vote counts, it was about Russian interference through espionage, including hacking and leaking information, and the use of troll farms to boost Trump’s campaign. The allegations against Obama feel flimsy, and the fact that they’re being promoted is seen as deeply unserious and, frankly, corrupt. The overarching sentiment is that it’s a distraction, a smokescreen meant to obscure the real issue.
The Epstein files, flight logs, and associated allegations against Trump, are readily available. The released documents and testimonies paint a damning picture, the evidence of alleged crimes is clearly shown. The user provided information, including court documents, the black book, flight logs with Trump’s name circled, and other related materials. The sheer volume of this information is overwhelming, and the implications are staggering. This flood of information seems intended to keep the pressure on and to remind everyone of the seriousness of the situation.
The accusations against Trump are explicitly stated: rape and sexual assault. This is not a subtle accusation; it’s a blunt statement meant to shock and grab attention. The user provided documentation, including the Howard Stern interview and Trump’s promise to his daughter, are then brought up to support the claims, and the insinuation that Trump’s modeling agency was involved in Epstein’s trafficking ring. The overall narrative is that the “hide ya kids, hide ya wife” sentiment captures the desperation of the situation and how Trump’s actions are seen as a direct betrayal of basic moral standards.
The core of the criticism lies in the perceived hypocrisy and desperation of the Trump camp. The argument is that the focus on the Obama “collusion” narrative is a blatant attempt to deflect from the ongoing Epstein scandal. The user emphasizes the fact that Gabbard was a former vice chair of the DNC in 2016 when the plan would have been concocted, which is used to explain her involvement. This is a direct accusation of political opportunism and a willingness to sacrifice principles for the sake of political gain.
The intelligence of the US intelligence community being questioned is at the forefront. The user wonders why anyone should suddenly believe Gabbard’s information after it was previously contradicted by the former president. The implication is that Gabbard’s sudden shift in focus is not based on genuine concern, but is politically motivated. The idea is that she’s trying to regain Trump’s favor. She used to be a progressive and is falling out of his favor because she told it like it is, the aftermath of the Iran bombing. Now, she needs to align with Trump.
The user explicitly calls out Gabbard’s past, hinting at her connections to a controversial religious group, with which she remains connected. This is meant to undermine her credibility further, and tie her to a cult. The user is highlighting a pattern of behavior, suggesting that Gabbard is operating within a predetermined framework of manipulation and deception. Her attempts to distract from the Epstein scandal by casting blame on Obama and pushing the Russia narrative, are seen as another piece of the puzzle.
The user provides links to various documents and information related to the Epstein scandal. The sharing of this information is intended to put forward concrete details to support the argument. There is an emphasis on the depth and breadth of the evidence against Trump, and the user directly highlights Trump’s alleged actions, as a direct and egregious offense. This all seems to serve as a contrast to the allegations against Obama, which the user sees as flimsy and unsubstantiated.
The underlying theme is that Trump is a pedophile, and Republicans are protecting him. This leads to the final thought, which is a direct question to Gabbard, and a condemnation of those who are protecting Trump. The accusations of Gabbard “feeding MAGA an Obama conspiracy” are clear, as well as the implication that this is a calculated move to protect Trump and deflect from the Epstein scandal. The main intent is to demonstrate the depths of the situation and paint Trump’s defenders as morally bankrupt and complicit.