By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following combat between India and Pakistan in May, French intelligence concluded that China utilized its embassies to disseminate doubts about the performance of the French-made Rafale fighter jets. This campaign aimed to discourage existing and potential buyers, such as Indonesia, from purchasing more Rafales in favor of Chinese-made aircraft. The initiative involved defense attachés in Chinese embassies echoing negative narratives about the Rafale’s performance in meetings with other nations’ officials. This disinformation campaign was reportedly extensive, including social media posts, manipulated imagery, and AI-generated content designed to promote Chinese weaponry.
Read the original article here
French intelligence: China used embassies to undermine sales of France’s flagship Rafale fighter jet. Well, this is hardly shocking news, is it? Embassies, at their core, are designed to advance a nation’s interests, and that includes promoting their own products while, well, subtly hindering the competition. It’s a game of geopolitical chess, played with diplomats and influence instead of bullets. This is often referred to as “war with no bullets”, and if you think about it, that’s exactly what embassies are for.
This is, in a nutshell, classic espionage stuff, something countries have been doing for decades. Think of it like a sophisticated, globalized version of a sales pitch. You’re proposing your products to other nations, subtly nudging them away from the competition, even if that means a bit of backroom maneuvering. This is just the way the game is played, and every country with a stake in military hardware sales does it. The United States, France, Russia – they all do it. The name of the game is to use all available leverage.
Take the United States, for example. They’ve been known to use their diplomatic influence to convince countries to buy their fighter jets, or even to change their minds on previous deals. Remember the Australian submarine debacle? That’s a prime example of the kind of high-stakes maneuvering that goes on behind the scenes. Australia initially chose French submarines, but the U.S. got involved and pushed for Anglo-American ones instead. It’s not exactly a friendly move, but in the world of international relations, it’s far from unusual.
But let’s be clear: China’s involvement is just one aspect of a complex situation. It’s important to remember that the Pakistani shootdown of an Indian Rafale, for instance, probably did more damage to the Rafale’s reputation and sales than any embassy whispers ever could. The reality is, these kinds of geopolitical and military sales are complex and influenced by many factors. Then you have other things like the potential for bribery, as seen in the Lockheed bribery scandals of the past. It’s the nature of the beast.
Of course, sometimes the sales pitch goes beyond mere promotion. There is an acknowledged reality of leveraging situations. If something can be used for leverage, it will be. And the old gentleman’s game of diplomacy continues to play out behind the scenes.
The fact is, everyone in government and politics understands this. It’s a standard part of the game. It’s just business, or as some might put it, diplomatic warfare. To say China is the only country doing it would be a huge oversimplification. Other countries are always playing the same game. It is a global playing field with players that are more than happy to use all the resources they have to advance their goals.
Take the case of Australia’s submarine deal. France lost a deal with Australia not because of China, but because of their own actions, specifically their demands in contract negotiations. Australia needed extremely capable submarines, but France seemingly pushed too hard, leading Australia to explore other options. The U.S. was the one that offered Australia a better deal.
Ultimately, the Rafale is a capable aircraft, a solid 4th generation fighter. But even the best of its kind has limitations. This whole saga reminds us that the world of international arms sales is a complex and often messy arena.