By John Q. Hosedrinker The death of Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, is causing controversy within the MAGA community. This stems from the Justice Department and FBI’s recent memo confirming Epstein’s suicide and denying the existence of a client list, contradicting previous statements and expectations set by Trump administration officials. Key figures like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, who previously promoted Epstein conspiracy theories, now oversee the review of files but have not addressed the lack of released information, fueling calls for transparency. Public statements made by Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, about releasing information have further contributed to the backlash, leaving many in the MAGA base feeling betrayed.
Read the original article here
The FBI says there is no Epstein list — angering much of President Trump’s base. This statement from the FBI, denying the existence of an extensive “Epstein list,” has ignited a firestorm of frustration and anger within a significant portion of President Trump’s support base. The core issue revolves around the widespread belief that such a list exists, detailing the high-profile individuals involved in Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking ring. This belief has been fueled by years of speculation, leaked documents, and a general distrust of established institutions, especially the FBI.
The sentiment among Trump supporters seems to be, “Where’s the list?” Many feel betrayed, particularly by figures like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, who, early on, were vocal in their calls for transparency and promised to expose the truth behind Epstein’s activities. The expectation was that these individuals, once in positions of influence, would unearth and disseminate the information, holding powerful figures accountable. Now, with the FBI’s denial, many see this as a betrayal of those earlier promises, a sign that the “Deep State” has won. They question the motives and integrity of those who once championed the cause but now seem to be downplaying or dismissing the existence of the list.
The heart of the matter is trust – or the lack thereof. President Trump’s base has long been skeptical of the FBI, a sentiment he has actively encouraged with statements like, “The FBI and the Department of Justice have become vicious monsters” and “The FBI is totally corrupt.” Therefore, the FBI’s pronouncements are often met with immediate skepticism. Some believe the agency is either intentionally covering up the truth or that they have been corrupted to the point where their word is no longer credible. The core of Trump’s support seems to be unwilling to accept the FBI’s findings, seeing it as another example of powerful forces protecting their own.
The ambiguity around the term “list” further complicates matters. Many understand that the term doesn’t refer to a single document titled “Pedo List,” but rather the information that the FBI and other law enforcement agencies possess. This information includes names, flight logs, financial records, and witness testimonies that allegedly implicate numerous individuals. These files, logs and videos are likely in the bureau’s possession. This distinction is important because even if a specific, compiled list doesn’t exist in the literal sense, the absence of a compiled document does not negate the existence of the information itself, and the core of Trump’s support base knows this.
The lack of transparency and the failure to release potentially damning information have intensified the outrage. The base’s response suggests a deep-seated frustration with perceived corruption and a demand for accountability at all levels. The repeated denials, the slow pace of information releases, and the lack of consequences for those implicated have left many feeling that the powerful are being shielded while the truth remains buried. This sense of injustice fuels the anger and the demand for action. The call for transparency and for those involved to be held accountable resounds throughout the arguments, highlighting the core issue of distrust.
The disappointment is also directed at the perceived hypocrisy of certain figures, particularly those who have built careers on exposing corruption. Some feel that these individuals have abandoned their principles or are, at the very least, being less forthcoming than they promised. This sense of betrayal stings, as the base views themselves as having invested time, money, and emotional energy into a cause that now seems to be fading away.
The situation is further complicated by the existing political polarization in the country. The perception that the FBI is biased and politically motivated, coupled with the desire to see accountability for wrongdoing, contributes to the current state of affairs. The base is suspicious that the alleged list is not being released because it contains the names of members of their political party. The call for all files to be released is motivated by a desire to expose wrongdoings regardless of who they implicate, to restore confidence in justice and to hold those in power accountable.
The continued denial of the “list’s” existence is likely to deepen the divide and further erode trust in government institutions. The issue has become a symbol of the base’s distrust of the established order, and for many, the very idea that such a list doesn’t exist is absurd.