By John Q. Hosedrinker 
EU officials, in recent remarks made during a meeting with Chinese leaders, acknowledged a critical inflection point in their relationship. The EU highlighted economic imbalances and emphasized the need for reciprocal and mutually beneficial trade relations with China. Furthermore, the EU called on China to use its influence to encourage Russia to end its war in Ukraine. These discussions occurred amidst recent EU sanctions against Russia that included two Chinese banks, prompting a response of strong opposition from Beijing.
Read the original article here
The EU is essentially issuing a stark warning to China, urging them to use their influence to push Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine, as relations between the two parties seem to be at a critical juncture. The tone is cautious, even skeptical, with some suggesting the EU’s efforts might be little more than a way to vent frustration. There’s a sense that the EU may not be fully grasping the complexities of the situation, particularly China’s perspective.
The core issue is the perception that China isn’t acting as a neutral party, but instead is tacitly or actively supporting Russia. Concerns are raised about China supplying Russia with military equipment and drone technology. This alleged support is a major point of contention and fuels the EU’s push for China to intervene. There’s a definite worry that if China doesn’t change course, the relationship could deteriorate further, possibly to a breaking point.
The question of what the EU can offer China in return for its cooperation looms large. China is unlikely to act purely out of altruism. Some analysts suggest that the EU has to recognize its weaker position, at least in the current situation, and understand China’s motivations if it hopes to achieve anything. There is a belief that China perceives the EU as overly aligned with the US, lacking an independent foreign policy, and therefore not a reliable or rational partner.
From the Chinese perspective, the relationship with the EU is less critical than it is for the EU. Some voices suggest that China’s strategic interests may even align with a weakened Russia, as that would affect the current global balance of power. The idea is that a strong Russia, and a weaker West, suits China’s overall geopolitical goals.
The EU’s approach is being met with criticism, particularly the idea that the EU is attempting to dictate terms. The tone of demanding action, without offering significant incentives, is perceived as rude. There’s also the historical perspective that European countries have a past of invading China, not the other way around, and so demanding the EU to address the current situation seems hypocritical.
There is skepticism about the EU’s leverage. The EU is highly dependent on China for trade and investment. Some voices are calling for limiting commercial ties, but the sheer volume of trade makes this a challenging proposition. The EU has its own internal divisions to overcome, with some member states still indirectly trading with Russia, making a unified front difficult.
The central issue is that the EU, representing 27 independent countries, needs to find a way to effectively navigate its relationship with China. But the core question is: what is the alternative? Sanctioning China would put the EU into an economic crisis and make it a US vassal, especially since there’s no alternative to China in the market.
China seems to be playing a long game, the EU needs to define their own game plan. There’s also the concern that the EU’s actions are inadvertently pushing China closer to Russia, which only further exacerbates the problem. The EU must consider its own long-term interests and what it is truly willing and able to do.