By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to European diplomats, Russia is escalating its use of chemical weapons in Ukraine, aiming to inflict maximum suffering. Intelligence reports from Germany and the Netherlands indicate a growing trend, with over 9,000 instances of chemical weapon use since the invasion’s onset. The Dutch Defence Minister noted over 2,500 reported cases of chemical weapon-related symptoms in Ukraine, resulting in three deaths. The United States has also accused Russia of using chloropicrin, a banned choking agent, despite Russia’s commitment to the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Read the original article here
Russia’s increasing use of chemical weapons in Ukraine, it seems, is a deeply concerning escalation of a conflict already fraught with peril. The consensus seems to be that they are prepared to employ any tactic necessary to achieve their objectives, a strategy that is, frankly, terrifying to consider. The history of their support for Bashar al-Assad, who has been repeatedly accused of using chemical weapons against his own people in Syria, casts a dark shadow on their actions in Ukraine. This pattern of behavior, coupled with a perceived lack of consequences in the past, emboldens them to continue down this path, making the current situation even more alarming.
This raises a critical question: who can and will hold those responsible for these alleged atrocities accountable? The international community’s response, or lack thereof, is under a microscope. We have seen this movie before, and it’s a chilling reminder of how a lack of decisive action in the face of such violations can pave the way for further escalation and impunity. The fear is palpable; it’s not just about the use of chemical weapons in Ukraine, but about what this might portend for the future, perhaps even extending to other nations.
The specifics of the chemical weapons being deployed are crucial. We are talking about substances that are not just irritating, but potentially debilitating, causing significant harm and trauma. While we may not have a complete catalog of the weapons being used, the concern is centered on their purpose and the suffering they inflict. The escalation from tear gas-like substances to potentially more potent agents paints a grim picture of the evolving tactics being employed in Ukraine.
It’s impossible not to notice the historical context here. The West’s response – or lack thereof – to past transgressions by Russia has seemingly sent a message that these actions may come with limited repercussions. The use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime in Syria, with minimal international consequences, may have inadvertently legitimized their future use. The decision by former President Obama to avoid enforcing red lines against Assad is a prime example of how a perceived weakness can encourage aggressive behavior.
The fact that Russia’s actions are part of a long-term strategy is also key. They don’t operate on the same short-term cycles that often govern Western politics. Their planning horizons extend far beyond election cycles or quarterly reports, allowing them to implement a patient and calculated approach. This strategic patience has, in many ways, caught Western nations off guard in the past. This long-term vision, along with historical context, is essential to understanding the current situation.
One of the chemicals reportedly being used is chloropicrin, which is more potent than tear gas and can cause significant harm. While it may not be lethal in every instance, the very use of such substances in warfare is a violation of international law. Irritant gases are banned, making all chemical weapons, including tear gas, illegal on the battlefield. It’s also worth noting that the specifics on what they’re using remain unclear, but it’s not the same as sarin, which is in a whole different league.
Some suggest that the Russian Federation feels empowered to act with impunity due to past inaction. It’s a vicious cycle: a lack of accountability leads to further transgression, creating a dangerous precedent. It’s clear that the strategic goals involve more than immediate battlefield gains. The objective includes sowing fear and destabilization, potentially impacting the broader geopolitical landscape.
The question of accountability is at the heart of the matter. Who will be held responsible, and what will be the consequences? The failure to hold individuals accountable creates a climate of lawlessness. The use of chemical weapons is a war crime, and ignoring such violations only encourages further atrocities.
The issue isn’t limited to one specific political figure, but rather an intricate, ongoing problem. The long-term implications of inaction and perceived weakness are profound. The failure to act forcefully against past transgressions has created a dangerous precedent, where illegal and inhumane tactics become normalized and potentially escalated.
Ultimately, the current situation calls for decisive action from the international community. It is crucial to expose the facts, document the violations, and hold those responsible to account. Ignoring the situation or looking the other way isn’t an option, as this only emboldens further violations of international law.