By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein stated in an unaired interview conducted by Steve Bannon that he distanced himself from Donald Trump because he realized Trump was “a crook”. The clip of the interview was sent to Mark Epstein in 2019, but has since been removed. Epstein and Trump were known to be acquaintances who frequented elite social circles between the 1980s and 2000s. Though the nature of their falling out remains unclear, this new information sheds light on the complex relationship between the two figures.
Read the original article here
Jeffrey Epstein said he stopped hanging out with Trump “when he realized Trump was a crook,” according to his brother. This is a statement that really makes you stop and think, doesn’t it? The idea that someone like Jeffrey Epstein, a man known for his alleged involvement in some truly heinous acts, would distance himself from someone because of their perceived dishonesty, is a striking one. It’s a testament to the complexity of human morality, or perhaps, a dark sort of twisted logic.
It’s hard to not let the mind wander when you consider the layers of this. Apparently, being in cahoots with a child sexual predator was acceptable, but being a “crook” was a dealbreaker. Maybe it was a matter of practicality, a concern for reputation, or simply a difference in their understanding of the rules of engagement. One can’t help but wonder what specific actions or circumstances led Epstein to reach this conclusion. Was it a betrayal in a business deal? Perhaps a broken promise? Or was it something more fundamental, a sense that Trump’s behavior presented a risk to Epstein’s own activities?
The details, of course, remain shrouded in a fog of speculation. But the core takeaway is clear: according to Epstein’s brother, the relationship ended because of Trump’s alleged dishonesty. The contrast is remarkable, especially considering Epstein’s own history. It highlights the subjective nature of morality, where certain offenses are deemed tolerable while others cross a line. It makes you question the standards Epstein held – if any at all.
It also raises questions about Trump’s character and business practices. The fact that someone like Epstein would see him as a liability paints a vivid picture. It suggests that Trump’s dealings may have been perceived as reckless, unreliable, or perhaps even exploitative. It’s the old cliché of “a wolf in sheep’s clothing,” which can be difficult to believe from someone so outwardly brash.
The echoes of this sentiment resonate even further when you consider some of the figures associated with Trump. The tales of those who have placed their careers on the line for him and ultimately lost everything is a sobering picture. Roy Cohn, for instance, a mentor who laid out Trump’s playbook – lie, lie, lie, attack, attack, attack – died penniless and disgraced. His legacy was tarnished and everything he owned was taken, save for the fake cufflinks Trump gave him. This mirrors the story of Rudy Giuliani, another close ally who risked it all to parrot Trump’s claims, only to face disbarment and financial ruin. This paints a grim picture of the rewards for those who pledge their allegiance to Trump.
If a man known for his alleged crimes against children thinks you’re shady, you’ve got a problem. The implications of this statement are substantial, revealing a man who could be perceived as even more morally bankrupt than Epstein. It’s a commentary on Trump’s character, his business practices, and the company he kept. It shows the low bar for what constitutes acceptable behavior in his orbit.
In the end, the story of Epstein and Trump offers a stark reminder that even within the darkest of realms, there are lines that can be drawn. It’s a fascinating and disturbing window into the worlds these two men inhabited, and the standards by which they judged each other. And the enduring mystery of what specifically led Epstein to this realization. It leaves us with a lingering sense of unease, forcing us to reconsider our understanding of morality, power, and the company we keep.