The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has held Russia responsible for the downing of Flight MH17 in 2014 and for widespread human rights abuses in Ukraine. This marks a landmark ruling by an international court, finding Russia accountable for these actions. The court cited numerous violations, including torture and restrictions on civil rights. The decision, based on cases brought by Ukraine and the Netherlands, precedes Russia’s expulsion from the ECHR following the full-scale invasion.
Read the original article here
Russia responsible for MH17 downing, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has officially confirmed what many already suspected, even knew. The court’s finding that Russia bears responsibility for the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 is a pivotal moment, adding another layer of undeniable culpability. It’s a significant legal precedent, a formal acknowledgement of a horrific tragedy.
This ruling, issued by the Strasbourg-based court, isn’t just about the MH17 incident. It also explicitly links Russia to “widespread and flagrant abuses of human rights” stemming from the conflict in Ukraine. This timeframe spans from the initial aggression in Donbas, starting in 2014, all the way through to the full-scale invasion of 2022. This wider scope truly emphasizes the systematic nature of the alleged human rights violations and provides a comprehensive picture of the situation.
This marks a critical milestone. It’s the first instance where an international court has specifically held Russia accountable for both the MH17 disaster and the human rights abuses carried out during the ongoing war in Ukraine. The findings come from four cases, brought by Ukraine and the Netherlands, dating back to the period before Russia’s expulsion from the court due to the full-scale invasion.
The specific details of the MH17 case are absolutely tragic. On July 17, 2014, the flight was shot down over Ukraine’s Donetsk Oblast. All 283 passengers and 15 crew members perished. This included 196 Dutch citizens. The scale of this loss, the lives ripped away, is a deep wound.
The Russian response to the tragedy has been particularly egregious. Rather than acknowledging responsibility, the Kremlin opted for disinformation and conspiracy theories, actively attempting to deflect blame. The official denial, the shifting of blame – it’s all added to the pain and insult, leaving victims’ families with even less closure.
The question of “what now?” is the obvious one. It’s natural to feel a mix of frustration and a sense of helplessness. We’re talking about a country with immense power. There is a strong feeling of “what difference does it make?”
This ruling, while extremely important, does not automatically translate into immediate repercussions on the ground. The reality of geopolitics is a harsh one, and the potential for real-world consequences is uncertain. We’re aware of the limitations of such legal rulings when dealing with a nuclear power that consistently violates international norms.
There is a risk of cynicism creeping in, I get it. International organizations can sometimes seem like toothless tigers. The ability of these bodies to directly enforce their rulings is often limited. They can’t compel a nation like Russia to pay reparations, or to change its behavior overnight.
Of course, the call for action is there. The desire for justice, for truth, for accountability is an understandable sentiment. The idea that frozen Russian assets might be seized and used to help Ukraine is a very tangible action. Getting anything from Russia will be a challenge.
The most effective course of action is a difficult discussion. Supporting Ukraine is the single most important thing. Justice takes time. It really does. There are also some harsh realities, we will have to accept. A stronger military and the possibility of further sanctions on Russia are options.
Ultimately, the ECHR ruling is a victory for truth. It’s a step towards acknowledging the suffering of the victims and the broader human cost of this conflict. Let’s hope it contributes to ensuring the perpetrators are held accountable.
