By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Several Russian regions experienced large-scale drone attacks on July 10, 2025. Explosions were reported in Kursk Oblast, where a facility and warehouse were set ablaze, and Tula Oblast, where major defense industry facilities were targeted. Dubna near Moscow, home to the Kronshtadt drone manufacturing plant, was also hit. Furthermore, debris from a UAV fell on the territory of the PJSC Beriev Aircraft Company in Taganrog, while a drone crash-landed in Lipetsk Oblast, causing a fire. While the Russian Defence Ministry claimed to have intercepted 155 Ukrainian drones, no definitive information on the attacks’ consequences has been provided.
Read the original article here
Drone attack on Russia: explosions heard in Tula and near Moscow, home to drone factory – videos
Well, it seems like there’s been some activity in Russia that’s caught everyone’s attention, specifically involving drone attacks. Reports are coming in about explosions being heard in areas like Tula and near Moscow, and what’s particularly interesting is that one of these locations happens to be near a drone factory. I can only imagine what went through the minds of those who heard the news.
It’s pretty clear that the focus, from certain viewpoints, is on targeting military infrastructure. The idea is to hit the source. Destroying drone production, logistics, and supply chains is the name of the game. This strategic approach makes a lot of sense, especially now that Russia is reportedly fielding autonomous drones. It’s far more effective to take out the factories and storage facilities than to deal with the drones once they’re in the air.
The debate definitely seems to be raging, with the core argument being the best approach. The general consensus is that Ukraine’s actions are deliberate. They are going after military targets, factories, and critical infrastructure, essentially crippling Russia’s ability to wage war. There’s a strong sense of agreement that this is the best way to win the war. This approach, of course, is in stark contrast to Russia’s tactics, which, sadly, involve the indiscriminate targeting of civilians.
Now, there are definitely differing opinions on how much pressure to apply. Some people feel that targeting civilian areas could possibly change the situation, although this approach is not widely supported, but some consider it a possibility if the attacks continued and the war continued. There are concerns about potential consequences, like losing international support. Attacking civilians is seen as a potential move that might backfire, leading to more unity behind the Russian government. The emphasis remains on maintaining the moral high ground.
It’s also understood that there is a careful balancing act at play. Ukraine’s goal is to defend itself without giving Russia any reason to escalate further. There’s a clear understanding that a tactical nuclear response is a real, though hopefully unlikely, possibility. That is why it’s so important to be careful about how and where munitions are used.
The underlying reality is that the people who are behind the current attacks are not targeting civilians, but are instead hitting military targets. The fact is, it’s better to degrade enemy combat capabilities by targeting factories, oil deposits, and military bases – strategic targets that hurt Russia’s war machine.