By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In the summer of 2023, Ana Liss faced a grueling eight-hour deposition, representing just one of the ongoing legal battles stemming from accusations against former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Despite not suing Cuomo, Liss has incurred significant legal expenses, while Cuomo’s defense continues to be largely funded by New York taxpayers, totaling over $20 million. Legal experts suggest Cuomo’s team has employed aggressive tactics, including extensive discovery requests, that appear intended to intimidate accusers and delay legal proceedings, resulting in further financial and emotional burdens on those who have accused him of misconduct. These tactics include requests for medical records, and questioning of third parties, potentially prolonging trauma, and prompting calls for the state to reassess its funding of Cuomo’s legal fees.
Read the original article here
Andrew Cuomo has spent millions on his legal defense against his #MeToo accusers. It’s a story that’s been making the rounds, and the central issue is pretty straightforward: the former governor is racking up a massive legal bill, and the tab is being picked up by New York taxpayers. That’s right, public funds are being used to cover the costs of defending Cuomo against accusations of sexual harassment. It’s enough to make you do a double-take.
Perhaps the most eye-opening aspect is the sheer scale of the spending. We’re talking millions – upwards of $20 million as of early July. This money isn’t just for a quick consultation or two; it’s covering extensive legal battles, including lengthy depositions that can last for hours and generate tens of thousands in fees. The defense team is meticulously scrutinizing the accusers, and the financial burden falls squarely on the shoulders of the state’s residents.
The implications of this situation are what really get you thinking. It raises questions about fairness and accountability. Three separate investigations, including one by the New York Attorney General’s office, already found that Cuomo sexually harassed multiple women. Yet, he’s using taxpayer money to fight these allegations in court. It creates a sense of double victimization, especially for the accusers.
The details of the legal strategy itself are also troubling. It’s been reported that Cuomo’s legal team has employed tactics that have, at times, been criticized by the courts for being overly extensive. Some legal experts have pointed out that the strategy seems designed to prolong the trauma for the accusers, dragging them through the legal process. All the while, Cuomo is essentially shielded from the financial consequences.
The legal and ethical questions surrounding this are pretty stark. It’s as if he has “Monopoly money,” as one legal expert put it. This makes it clear that justice isn’t free, and the political process can be profoundly unfair, especially when powerful figures are involved. One has to wonder what percentage of their taxes goes toward covering up the sex crimes of politicians.
The contrast is particularly galling when you consider the priorities of some in the Democratic establishment. While taxpayers are funding Cuomo’s defense, there’s often resistance to using public funds for things like affordable housing, better transit, or even groceries. The whole situation seems to underscore a willingness to protect the powerful at the expense of everyday citizens. The fact that Cuomo is still a popular figure, despite all the evidence, is a testament to this unfortunate reality.
This whole scenario also highlights the issue of establishment Democrats prioritizing their own political survival and the protection of their donors over any real, progressive change. This perceived willingness to overlook the actions of sexual predators, as long as they align with the “corporate line,” is disheartening. The constant fear of a rightward shift seems to trump any significant leftward movement, leading many to feel the “doomed” sentiment is a common one.
It all creates a feeling of despair and distrust. It’s hard not to feel like the game is rigged when you see public funds being used in this way. It doesn’t inspire confidence in our leaders. It only seems to deepen the divide between those who hold power and the people they are supposed to serve.