By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On Saturday, China initiated construction of a USD 167.8 billion dam on the Brahmaputra River in Tibet, near the Indian border. The project, announced by Premier Li Qiang, will include five cascade hydropower stations and is projected to generate over 300 billion kWh of electricity annually. This infrastructure project, located in the Nyingchi region, is expected to supply electricity for external consumption while also fulfilling local needs in Tibet. The development has raised concerns in downstream countries like India and Bangladesh due to its scale.
Read the original article here
China begins construction of a massive, $167.8 billion Brahmaputra dam near the Indian border, a project that’s certainly grabbing attention and raising a whole lot of questions. The price tag alone is enough to make anyone’s jaw drop – that’s a serious investment in infrastructure. It’s important to keep in mind that with projects of this scale, it’s always wise to approach the news with a healthy dose of skepticism.
One of the first things that pops into mind is the potential downstream effects. This dam, built on the Brahmaputra River, a vital water source for India and Bangladesh, raises concerns about water control and availability. Some believe that China’s control over the river could impact water flow, potentially leading to shortages or flooding depending on how they manage the dam’s releases. The potential impact on Bangladesh, which is located downstream of both China and India, has to be considered very seriously.
The naming of the project is a bit unusual; with such a significant endeavor, it seems counterintuitive that a Chinese name isn’t being used. Perhaps the project has a different name depending on the source. In Chinese media, it’s referred to as the Yarlung Zangbo hydropower project, based on the Chinese name of the river. The actual location is in Tibet, where the river is known by its Tibetan name.
The sheer scale of the electricity generation is also impressive. The reports suggest that the hydropower station is expected to generate a massive amount of electricity each year, enough to power hundreds of millions of people. Although, with those numbers in mind, it seems the average Chinese household uses substantially less power than the average U.S. household.
Given its proximity to the border, the project might be seen as having economic implications for India. Some observers suggest that it could be a way for China to exert influence, potentially by controlling the water supply or by selling electricity to India. China’s approach to infrastructure is undeniable, but it doesn’t come without its detractors. Some sources even claim that China’s history with dam projects has resulted in significant environmental damage and strained international relations.
One of the biggest concerns is the environmental impact. Mega-dams often disrupt ecosystems both upstream and downstream, potentially impacting fish migration, sediment flow, and water quality. Some scientists also point out that dams can contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, as the rotting of vegetation underwater can release methane. When considering these types of massive infrastructure projects, the balance between progress and sustainability is always a critical issue.
It is important to recognize that this is not simply a “dam” in the conventional sense. Instead, some reports describe it as a tunnel designed to generate electricity using the river’s height differences. It’s worth noting that India also has dams on the Brahmaputra, leading to the ever-present potential for both countries to impact the water supply.
A project of this magnitude inevitably raises questions about transparency and accountability. With concerns about environmental impact, it’s important to know whether thorough environmental impact studies have been conducted. The long-term effects of such a project on the region, its people, and the environment are hard to anticipate fully, emphasizing the need for thorough investigation and ongoing monitoring.