By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has ended its emergency response to H5N1 bird flu, citing a decrease in cases and the absence of human cases since February 2025. While the emergency response has been deactivated, surveillance, readiness, and response for influenza, including H5N1, will continue under existing programs. The emergency response, which began on April 4, 2024, allowed for additional public health support. Experts note the seasonality of bird flu, with potential for cases to rise again in the fall or winter, but the current public health risk remains low.
Read the original article here
CDC ends emergency response to H5N1 bird flu, and it seems to be a decision that has been brewing for a while. Reports of animal infections with avian influenza A(H5N1) virus, or H5N1 bird flu, have reportedly decreased. No human cases have been reported since February 2025, which, let’s be honest, is a welcome change. This shift in status wasn’t a directive handed down from the top but rather originated from within the CDC itself. Apparently, the career scientists were the ones who made the call, and it makes sense, right? The need to maintain a constant state of high alert diminishes when there are no new human cases.
This approach seems logical – if there were to be a resurgence of human cases, the response could be quickly escalated. It’s reportedly a matter of re-mobilizing resources rapidly, perhaps even in a single afternoon. Considering the nature of emergencies, this perspective feels spot-on. Much like a house fire: when the flames are out, the emergency is over, even if there was a serious threat not too long ago.
Of course, there are valid questions and concerns to consider. Some individuals understandably worry about the potential for complacency. After all, a disease doesn’t simply vanish because the official emergency response ends. This is especially true when you factor in the potential for the virus to evolve. The effectiveness of future vaccines is a major point of concern, and the possibility of an intermediate host also lingers in the shadows. The idea of “wait and see” can be uncomfortable, particularly in the face of a disease that’s shown it can have severe effects on humans.
What is also important to remember is that the situation can change. As the colder months approach, and with them the increased likelihood of contagious diseases spreading, we’ll need to monitor for potential issues. The possibility that the government, or this particular administration, may not respond effectively in a future outbreak also creates an understandable feeling of unease. There are worries about the impacts on farmers and food prices, as well as whether potential government responses would take into account the needs of workers and their safety.
It is worth noting, however, that the decision to end the emergency response isn’t necessarily a sign of failure. It’s a pragmatic measure reflecting the current reality. The fact that doctors and scientists, from various organizations, haven’t reported anything in months gives a sense of comfort, but we also have to be vigilant.
Of course, let’s not overlook the less serious considerations. There’s a touch of skepticism about how politics and economics might interact with this announcement. There is some speculation that some would rather see the situation get worse, or they might try to use the announcement as a way to score political points, regardless of whether the actual changes have anything to do with their actions.
So, what’s the takeaway? The CDC ending the emergency response to H5N1 bird flu is a calculated move, but it’s not a declaration of victory. It’s a recognition of the current state of affairs, with an understanding that the situation can be rapidly reassessed. We should continue to be aware of the situation, follow updates from respected health professionals and be prepared to adapt if circumstances change.