By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Prime Minister Mark Carney has condemned Israel’s denial of humanitarian aid to Gaza, labeling it a violation of international law. He demanded Israel relinquish control of aid distribution, highlighting the blockage of Canadian-funded aid intended for starving civilians. This statement follows French President Emmanuel Macron’s announcement of France’s intent to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly. Federal Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand plans to attend a conference in New York to discuss Macron’s decision and, alongside 24 of her international counterparts, signed a joint statement calling Israel’s aid distribution “dangerous” and demanding an immediate end to the war in Gaza.
Read the original article here
Carney calls Israel denying humanitarian aid in Gaza ‘violation of international law’, and this is a statement that, on its face, carries significant weight, especially given the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the region. However, the issue is immediately complicated by the inherent vagueness of the phrase “international law.” What specific laws is Carney referring to? Without clear specifics, the statement risks becoming a rhetorical flourish rather than a precise legal assessment.
The denial of humanitarian aid is a serious matter, particularly when considering the dire circumstances in Gaza. There are reports of a substantial amount of aid waiting to be distributed, but the UN, for various reasons, isn’t facilitating the process. Israel’s role in controlling access and movement within Gaza is also a key factor, and any actions that hinder the delivery of essential supplies could indeed be considered a violation of international law. The question, then, becomes not whether a violation is *possible*, but whether it’s actually happening. The UN’s own position is complicated by demands. They are asking Israel to allow Hamas police security, even though it is against their initial statements.
The situation on the ground appears muddled. There’s a complex interplay of actors, including Israel, Hamas, the UN, and various aid organizations. The UN’s seemingly contradictory stance – demanding Israel ensure security while simultaneously refusing IDF security for aid convoys – further highlights the difficulties of navigating this complicated environment. It seems there’s a disconnect between the expressed responsibilities and the practical realities of aid delivery, and the UN’s statements suggest a struggle to reconcile these conflicting demands.
Israel is in a position of power and control in the Gaza Strip, making the nation responsible for any acts against the civilians of Gaza. The argument that Hamas is the primary obstacle to aid delivery doesn’t negate this. The United States and Israel have delivered millions of meals to Gaza, but this doesn’t fully address the ongoing crisis. The fact remains that people are starving and in desperate need of assistance. International law is not effective if there’s no means to enforce it.
The focus on “international law” becomes particularly relevant when considering the potential for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. These are serious offenses, governed by statutes like the Rome Statute, to which Israel is not a signatory.
There are conflicting accounts and accusations of wrongdoing from all sides of the conflict. Arguments are made that Hamas is stealing aid and preventing its distribution, while Israel is criticized for restricting access and creating conditions that exacerbate the suffering. The Gaza Health Ministry, run by Hamas, is not considered a politically neutral source and media outlets who are using its information should be mindful.
Ultimately, the situation is not just a matter of international law; it’s a matter of human lives. There is a great deal of aid waiting to be distributed, and the most important thing is to get food and other supplies into the hands of the people who desperately need them. There are many players with different agendas and motivations, and this is making it more complicated to deliver aid.
The situation is incredibly complex, with accusations of bad faith and even outright lies flying around. The delivery of aid should be the priority, and any actions, whether by Israel, Hamas, or other actors, that impede the safe and efficient delivery of this aid need to be addressed and rectified.