Attorney General Pam Bondi has fired her personal ethics advisor, Joseph Tirrell, a career attorney with nearly 20 years of service, without stating a reason for his removal. Tirrell, who headed the DOJ’s ethics office, advised senior officials on matters such as financial disclosures and conflicts of interest, and also provided guidance to all DOJ employees. His removal may be related to the roughly 20 employees involved in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations, where Tirrell had advised on ethics matters. The move comes amidst other departures of key oversight officials, raising concerns about the potential politicization of the Justice Department.
Read the original article here
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. Honestly, the headline practically writes itself, doesn’t it? It’s like a punchline you already know, but you still have to hear it for the grim satisfaction. It seems like ethics, in this administration, are about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. It’s no surprise, is it?
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. The whole situation stinks of the well-worn playbook. It’s a pattern, isn’t it? Someone with ethics gets in the way, and *poof*, they’re gone. It’s a clear message: if you value your job, you better not value doing the right thing. This whole thing feels like a slow-motion train wreck, and we’re all just watching, maybe with a mix of horror and morbid curiosity.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. The sheer audacity of it all is breathtaking. It’s not even subtle anymore. It’s like they’re saying, “We don’t care, we’re in charge, and we’ll do whatever we want.” And the fact that this is happening while certain… *allegations*… swirl around, makes it even more stomach-churning.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. Thinking back, it’s hard to imagine what an ethics chief in *this* administration was even supposed to *do*. It’s a bit like being a lifeguard at the Titanic. Were they there to advise, to warn, or just to offer a polite “that’s probably not a good idea” before being promptly ignored? It seems they were there to do absolutely nothing.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. The deeper you dig, the uglier it gets. The idea of an ethical compass being irrelevant in the face of political gain is… disheartening, to say the least. The whole thing is just so transparent.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. When you consider her past, it’s like, what did anyone expect? The connections, the payoffs, the apparent willingness to look the other way… it all paints a pretty clear picture. There are no surprises anymore.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. One can only assume that the ethics chief was either ineffective, or was actually doing their job and causing problems for Bondi. Either way, their fate was sealed. When you have someone like Bondi in power, ethics and oversight are viewed as obstacles to be removed.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. The parallels to other instances of the administration silencing dissent and removing those who stand in the way of power are impossible to ignore. The DOJ seems to exist to serve one person: Trump, not the country.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. It’s just another brick in the wall of corruption. This seems like a systematic effort to remove any and all obstacles to their agenda. The Constitution and the American people just don’t seem to be in the equation.
Bondi Fires Her Personal Ethics Chief as DOJ Purge Continues. It’s like saying Hitler had a PR specialist. Ethics is simply something they don’t want to deal with. This entire administration just hates the word. The role was irrelevant, the firing was inevitable, and the lack of surprise is perhaps the saddest part of the story.
