By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ahead of a briefing on Canada-U.S. trade negotiations, B.C. Premier David Eby suggested an opportunity might exist for a deal on softwood lumber. Eby expressed the belief that U.S. leadership lacks awareness of the offensive nature of their comments, citing Ambassador Hoekstra’s remarks about Canadians being “nasty” to deal with. Eby also stated that Canadian boycotts were “having an impact,” and encouraged Canadians to stand firm against the U.S. government’s stance, asserting everyday Americans hold different views.
Read the original article here
B.C. premier slams U.S. ambassador for saying Trump thinks Canadian boycotts are ‘nasty,’ and let me tell you, it’s a sentiment that’s echoing pretty loudly right now. It’s not every day you see a premier come out swinging, but when the former U.S. president, a man now infamous for a whole host of controversies, calls something “nasty,” it seems to have touched a nerve. And frankly, it’s not hard to understand why. After all, the whole situation feels like a giant pot calling the kettle black.
The core of the issue boils down to this: the former U.S. president, or at least his administration, thinks Canadian boycotts of American products and travel are “nasty.” Considering the origin of the statement, the irony is practically dripping from every word. The general feeling is that a confirmed pedophile has no place criticizing others, especially given the gravity of the situation. The former U.S. president’s actions and alleged involvement in various scandals cast a long shadow.
It’s pretty evident that this isn’t just about trade. It’s about values, principles, and the kind of world Canadians want to live in. They see the former president and his associates as representing something fundamentally opposed to those values. The idea that the U.S. ambassador is somehow above reproach, especially when the former U.S. president himself is the center of so many controversies, strikes many as absurd.
The accusations against the former president are serious and, frankly, disturbing. From his alleged involvement in cases to the embrace of a more authoritarian style of governance, many Canadians are clearly uncomfortable with the direction they see the U.S. heading. The fact that this former president, who’s been implicated in so many disturbing events, would then turn around and label Canadian boycotts as “nasty,” feels deeply hypocritical.
There’s a feeling that the U.S. doesn’t fully grasp the Canadian perspective. It’s perceived as if the U.S. views Canada’s reluctance to embrace its policies as a personal affront, a rejection of a “generous offer.” It’s as though the former U.S. president and his followers can’t comprehend that not everyone wants to be American, and that is okay.
Some people have expressed a deep and justified anger towards the former president and his followers. There’s a sense that the former U.S. president, and by extension, his administration, has overstepped. To some, it’s a threat, a sign that the U.S. doesn’t respect Canadian sovereignty or values. These sentiments are shared among those who feel the U.S. has become an “enemy state.”
This situation highlights a growing trend of Canadians wanting to distance themselves from the former U.S. president’s influence. They see the U.S. as being on the wrong side of history and they don’t want to be associated with it. The premier’s reaction, while strong, seems to be tapping into a widespread feeling of frustration and disgust.
The responses go far beyond the initial exchange. Many see the situation as a chance to double down on their boycott efforts. The more the former U.S. president and his administration criticize, the more determined many Canadians become to stand their ground. It’s a classic case of “you can’t tell us what to do.”
Also, some people point out the hypocrisy of the U.S. when the U.S. doesn’t seem to understand how the Canadian system works. For example, there is discussion that Canada “banned” the import of alcohol from the U.S., but that is not the case; it’s not that the U.S. can’t import its alcohol; its just not on the shelves of Canadian liquor stores.
And let’s not forget the alleged actions that have come to light. This all serves as a stark reminder of why Canadians are so wary of what they perceive as the U.S.’s descent into a morally questionable path. This entire situation seems to have amplified a sense of moral outrage. The former U.S. president and his administration’s comments have only fueled the fire. The reactions are a sign that this story is far from over.