By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Texas Governor Greg Abbott is seeking to keep communications with Elon Musk and his companies private, citing concerns about privacy, potential embarrassment, and the impact on open decision-making. The Texas Newsroom requested the emails to examine Musk’s influence in the state. However, the Governor’s office has requested a ruling from the Texas Attorney General to withhold the records, citing the “common-law privacy” exception, and potentially commercial interests. Legal experts like Bill Aleshire are critical of the move. The Attorney General’s office has 45 business days to decide.
Read the original article here
Gov. Greg Abbott’s claim that emails exchanged with Elon Musk are too “intimate and embarrassing” to be made public immediately raises a flurry of questions and suspicions. It’s not just a matter of transparency, but also a blatant disregard for the principles of public service. When you’re a public servant, everything you do, especially when it involves communication related to your official duties, is essentially public property. It’s a basic tenet of a democratic society. To try to hide these emails, especially citing reasons that are, frankly, personal and irrelevant to the public’s right to know, is, at the very least, highly questionable.
The fact that the governor’s office initially agreed to the cost and process of releasing the emails, only to later backpedal and claim confidentiality, is telling. It’s like they realized the potential fallout and scrambled to cover their tracks. The fact that they then sought the intervention of the Texas Attorney General adds another layer of intrigue. It creates the impression that there’s something they desperately want to keep hidden, and that’s never a good look for a public official.
The language used, “intimate and embarrassing,” is particularly interesting. It sparks the imagination, leading to speculation about the nature of these communications. Were they sharing private jokes? Were they discussing personal matters? Or, as some have suggested, were they perhaps making unflattering comments about other public figures, such as a certain former president? The possibilities are endless, and that’s precisely why the public has a right to see these emails. Public officials need to understand that their work phones and emails are not for personal use.
The situation does bring up a valid point regarding workplace etiquette. Federal employees are trained to know that the government owned equipment is not a private matter. The fact that they are discussing personal matters over these government networks shows a lack of good judgement. If these officials are exchanging private messages, they should be using personal devices and accounts, not those funded by taxpayers and subject to public scrutiny.
The nature of the relationship between Abbott and Musk is also something that merits examination. They are both powerful figures with significant influence in their respective fields. The public deserves to know the extent of their interactions, especially when they involve state business or potential financial dealings. When two influential individuals are in cahoots, it’s very important that the public has access to these documents. The use of such intimate language and the decision to hide them from the public is a signal that this is not your typical work conversation.
Of course, there are those who might try to defend Abbott by saying that everyone is entitled to some level of privacy, even public officials. However, there’s a significant difference between personal privacy and the actions of a public servant. When you take on a role in government, you accept a certain degree of scrutiny. You understand that your actions, your communications, and your relationships are open to public examination. It’s a trade-off that comes with the job.
It’s not surprising to see this kind of maneuvering, especially in the current political climate. It has become all too common for politicians to attempt to hide information from the public, whether it’s through obfuscation, stonewalling, or outright denial. In cases like this, it’s crucial that the public and the media demand transparency. The public needs to keep fighting and demanding that this is not allowed. The more that politicians are allowed to sweep things under the rug, the more damage is done to the public’s trust.
If these emails are indeed embarrassing, then maybe there is a reason why, and the public should definitely see them. What is being hidden here? Are these emails about making fun of political rivals? Are they about backroom deals and the potential for corruption? Regardless of the content, the fact that Abbott is fighting so hard to keep them private should be a major red flag. This situation underscores the importance of government transparency and the public’s right to know what its elected officials are doing. The public should be pushing for their release, and demanding answers about the nature of the relationship between the Governor and the billionaire businessman.