By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent address, President Zelenskyy announced Ukraine’s withdrawal from the Ottawa Convention, which bans anti-personnel mines, due to Russia’s continued use of these weapons. The President emphasized the necessity of these mines for defense purposes, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict with Russia. This decision serves as a strategic move to focus on essential defense needs and signals a call to action for all partners along Russia’s borders. Zelenskyy also highlighted the complexities of the withdrawal process during wartime while condemning Russia’s use of these deadly weapons.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders sparks a weighty discussion. It’s a hard reality, but the decision to withdraw from the Ottawa Convention, the treaty banning anti-personnel landmines, isn’t surprising. It’s a grim necessity, a sign of the times. Poland, it seems, took similar steps a while back. And the logic? Well, it boils down to survival. Ukraine needs to protect its land, and landmines, as brutal as they are, become a defensive tool, especially against a relentless aggressor.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders throws into stark relief the moral quandary faced by Ukraine. The arguments against the use of landmines are clear: they can maim, and they linger, a constant threat to civilians long after the conflict ends. It’s a heavy burden on future generations who inherit these dangers. Nations that were once part of the treaty, like Finland, are also reconsidering their positions, highlighting the shifting landscape of international norms in the face of a determined enemy.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders reveals the dire realities on the ground. We must remember that Russia’s invasion has already scattered the Ukrainian landscape with mines and unexploded ordnance. Given this, Ukraine’s use of landmines is a stark contrast to Russia’s strategy of indiscriminately targeting civilian areas, torturing prisoners, and committing other war crimes. The moral burden that Ukraine is facing is immense.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders emphasizes the core issue: survival. Ukraine, in its struggle, is forced to make difficult choices. Choosing to use mines, even if it means future risks, is a strategic decision. Ukraine can control the location of these mines, and the West, in turn, can meticulously track their placement and potentially set them to self-destruct. The focus is to counter Russia’s tactics to avoid Russia taking control of the land.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders isn’t about equating the two sides. It underscores that Russia has openly disregarded international laws, treaties, and the Geneva Convention. It’s an unprovoked invasion with blatant disregard for human life. Russia’s doctrine, centered on artillery bombardment and widespread mining, contrasts with Ukraine’s defense, where choices must be made to defend territory.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders indicates a difficult situation for Ukraine. The West’s actions, or lack thereof, are effectively forcing Ukraine into a position where tough decisions are inevitable. Ukraine is fighting for its sovereignty, in a situation of inadequate Western support. Ukraine’s survival is at stake.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders shows the importance of distinction. Russia’s actions, like the targeted killings of civilians, the torture of POWs, and the use of drones for attacks, create a stark difference. Ukraine’s aim is freedom; Russia’s is conquest and subjugation. The moral clarity lies in defending Ukrainian land and protecting its people. The choice is not merely about military tactics, it’s a moral obligation.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders raises essential questions. The question is: what point is there in fighting if Ukraine succumbs to Russia’s tactics? The decision is a balancing act, but the primary goal remains: survival and the preservation of the nation’s identity.
Zelenskyy on Ottawa Convention withdrawal: signal to all partners along Russia’s borders signifies a desperate struggle. Ukraine’s use of landmines is a difficult one. But it is vastly different from the horrors Russia is perpetrating. The argument isn’t about the morality of landmines; it’s about what happens if Ukraine loses. In such a situation, if Ukraine is destroyed, what is the point?