By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Paul VanDuyne Jr. and Andrea Whitaker, a Wisconsin couple, face attempted murder charges for allegedly poisoning two women VanDuyne previously dated. The victims, who met VanDuyne through dating apps, reported experiencing illnesses caused by thallium, cyanide, and hydrogen sulfide. Prosecutors claim the couple, who met online, plotted to poison the victims using various toxins, including abrin created from rosary peas. Bail has been set at $10 million for VanDuyne and $4 million for Whitaker.
Read the original article here
A Wisconsin couple, a boyfriend and girlfriend, have been charged with attempted murder for allegedly plotting to poison and kill two women the man had previously dated through online dating apps. The sheer audacity of the alleged plan is chilling. These women, who had only met the man a few times, found themselves targeted in a disturbing and terrifying ordeal.
One victim recounted a frightening encounter where she discovered a stranger – later identified as the girlfriend – lurking near her car in her garage. The sheer invasion of privacy and the implied threat are deeply unsettling. This level of calculated stalking suggests a premeditated and deeply disturbing plan.
The other victim’s case came to light when a doctor at the Wisconsin Poison Center reported a woman hospitalized with thallium in her system. Thallium, a highly toxic substance once used as a rodenticide, is now banned from household and commercial use due to its inherent danger and potential for accidental poisoning. The fact that this substance was used deliberately highlights the calculated nature of the alleged crime.
The use of thallium, a substance largely inaccessible to the average person, underscores the planning and preparation involved in this alleged attack. It’s not a readily available poison; it requires a degree of premeditation and knowledge that elevates the severity of the crime considerably. The methodical approach further suggests a chilling level of organization and intent.
The alleged motive remains murky. The man reportedly contacted one victim months after their last interaction, calling her “evil.” He claimed his girlfriend had “committed suicide” after discovering their conversations, a statement later revealed to be false. This highlights the manipulative nature of the alleged perpetrators and the fabricated narrative they attempted to construct. The lack of a clear motive adds a layer of complexity and makes the whole situation even more unsettling; it’s arguably scarier when the reason for the attack is unclear.
The alleged accomplice’s role underscores the disturbing dynamic between the couple. The notion of one person enabling another’s actions, especially in such a violent and calculated manner, points towards a troubling level of shared intent and depravity. This isn’t simply a crime committed by one person; it’s a joint effort, revealing a frightening synergy of malice.
The incident highlights the inherent risks associated with online dating. It serves as a sobering reminder that meeting strangers online carries potential dangers, no matter how careful one is. This case should encourage increased caution and awareness when engaging with online dating platforms.
Beyond the immediate impact on the victims, the case also raises concerns about the ease with which such harmful substances can potentially be obtained. The resources available for obtaining such materials and the knowledge required to use them effectively shouldn’t be underestimated. This aspect of the alleged crime warrants further investigation and potential legislative review.
The fact that the couple apparently operated a makeshift laboratory in their home to produce the poison emphasizes the seriousness of the allegations. The brazen disregard for public safety is alarming. Setting up a clandestine lab to produce toxins in a residential area demonstrates a shocking disregard for the well-being of those around them.
The alleged perpetrators’ backgrounds further add to the complexity of the case. The man’s background in chemical engineering, coupled with the girlfriend’s pharmaceutical knowledge, created a concerning combination of expertise. This knowledge base allowed them to potentially utilize their skills in a destructive manner, escalating the danger significantly. The combination of professional skills and criminal intent represents a dangerous convergence.
This case brings to mind similar historical instances of couples committing heinous crimes fueled by jealousy or a desire for control, such as the case of Diane Zamora and David Graham. Such cases highlight the devastating consequences of interpersonal dynamics gone terribly wrong. The similarities and differences between these cases highlight the ongoing challenge of understanding and preventing such crimes.
The investigation of this case is ongoing and highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to investigating crimes of this nature, including digital forensics to analyze online activity and lab analysis to identify the specific toxins used. The digital footprint left by the alleged perpetrators will likely be a key element of the case.
Finally, the case serves as a stark reminder of the unpredictability of human behavior and the importance of vigilance, both in personal relationships and in the broader community. The alleged actions of this Wisconsin couple are extreme but serve as a cautionary tale against dismissing potential threats and trusting blindly in appearances. The seemingly ordinary couple living next door could harbor an unimaginable darkness.