By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Vietnam has repealed its decades-old two-child policy due to a sharply declining birth rate. The new regulation grants couples the autonomy to determine the number of children they have and the spacing between births. Previously, the policy, implemented in 1988, limited families to one or two children, with penalties for Communist Party members who violated it. This change reflects Vietnam’s rapid population aging and the need to address potential future economic consequences. The country’s total fertility rate has fallen below the replacement level for three consecutive years.
Read the original article here
Vietnam’s recent decision to abolish its two-child policy arrives amidst a record low birth rate, a trend reflecting broader global challenges rather than a simple policy failure. While the policy itself was loosely enforced, rarely impacting those outside the Communist Party, its symbolic weight underscored a concern about population growth that now feels outdated.
The plummeting birth rate isn’t solely attributable to the now-defunct policy; it’s a symptom of deeper economic anxieties. The high cost of living, particularly concerning housing, and an intensely competitive job market are significant deterrents to having children. These economic realities create a situation where raising a family is perceived as financially unsustainable for many Vietnamese citizens.
In fact, the situation mirrors global trends where industrialization shifts the value of children from a source of free labor (common in agrarian societies) to an expensive burden. This shift significantly impacts family planning decisions, especially for those in lower-income brackets. The Vietnamese experience aligns with this paradigm, reflecting the struggles of balancing personal aspirations with the realities of economic hardship.
While the 2.1 birth rate required for population neutrality is not being met (Vietnam currently sits at 1.9), the situation isn’t as dire as some might think. Negative net migration, though impacting some regions, is relatively small (-0.9). Consequently, the overall population remains mostly stable, experiencing only minor decreases.
The government’s motivation for ending the policy is clear: a shrinking population translates to reduced tax revenue and a strain on social support systems. The fear is a future reminiscent of Italy, where declining populations lead to the decline of smaller towns and villages. However, an excessively high birth rate also presents challenges, placing undue stress on existing infrastructure and resources.
The abolition of the two-child policy is not a panacea. Many believe it’s unlikely to reverse the declining birth rate, since the fundamental economic concerns remain unaddressed. The policy was a blunt instrument that likely had minimal impact even during its existence and the current low birth rate is a product of a broader global phenomenon. While there is a potential to revive the policy if the birth rate swings back to unsustainable levels, the focus should shift to offering substantial financial and other forms of support for families choosing to have more children.
The Vietnamese situation highlights a crucial dilemma: how to balance economic realities with population growth. While increased birth rates may seem like a straightforward solution to economic concerns, it’s a simplistic solution to a complex problem. It’s a problem compounded by the fact that most countries have not found a successful way to reverse declining birth rates in the face of increased development and improving standards of living. The inherent challenges facing young Vietnamese couples – high living costs, competitive jobs and lack of adequate childcare – necessitate a multifaceted approach beyond simple policy changes.
The long-term implications of a shrinking workforce are significant. Fewer young people entering the workforce to support a growing elderly population threaten the sustainability of social security systems and could lead to economic stagnation. Similar concerns plague many East Asian countries, such as South Korea and China, raising concerns about long-term economic viability.
The problem isn’t simply a matter of population size, but rather the age distribution within the population. A population pyramid that bulges at the top (a large elderly population) and tapers off at the bottom (a small younger population) signals potential economic instability. This demographic imbalance makes it more difficult for the working-age population to support the elderly, leading to a potential strain on social systems.
Vietnam’s experience highlights a wider issue facing many developed and developing nations: the complex interplay between economic development, societal changes and population dynamics. The solution isn’t a simple policy adjustment, but requires a comprehensive strategy encompassing economic support for families, improved social safety nets, and long-term planning to address the demographic challenges ahead. The hope is that addressing the root causes of the falling birth rate – namely the economic hurdles – is the best way forward. Only time will tell if this approach will prove successful.