By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has mandated that its physicians and scientists require pre-approval from political appointees before publishing in medical journals or speaking publicly. This directive, issued following the publication of a critical article in the New England Journal of Medicine, requires coordination with the VA’s public affairs office for all media engagements. The policy, while claimed to be longstanding, is seen by critics as censorship, particularly given concurrent efforts to restrict scientific research funding and publication. The authors of the article, which highlighted the negative impact of VA budget cuts on veterans’ healthcare, reported receiving support from colleagues despite the administration’s actions.
Read the original article here
The Department of Veterans Affairs, a cornerstone of American medical research, has issued an order requiring scientists to obtain clearance before publishing in scientific journals. This unprecedented move, occurring under the Trump administration, raises serious concerns about academic freedom and the integrity of scientific inquiry. The sheer scale of the VA’s research enterprise – with nearly a billion dollars in annual funding, over 7,300 active projects, and more than 10,000 publications yearly – makes this decision particularly impactful. The potential consequences for scientific advancement are immense.
This mandate isn’t simply about bureaucratic oversight; it appears to be a deliberate attempt to control the flow of information. The administration’s lack of scientific understanding is painfully apparent, suggesting the driving force behind this decision is not a genuine desire for quality control but rather a political agenda to suppress dissenting viewpoints. This resembles historical attempts by authoritarian regimes to promote ideologically pure science, a strategy that has consistently failed and resulted in catastrophic consequences.
The chilling effect on research is undeniable. Scientists fear retribution for publishing findings that contradict the administration’s narrative. The implication is clear: self-censorship will become rampant, leading to a suppression of crucial research, and possibly impacting vital areas like veteran suicide prevention. This is a significant departure from the open and transparent nature of scientific discourse, vital for progress and public health.
This pre-publication clearance process is not just a hindrance to scientific advancement; it’s also a potential violation of free speech principles. The government’s attempt to control scientific publications mirrors tactics employed by oppressive regimes, creating a climate of fear and stifling intellectual curiosity. The implied censorship is deeply disturbing, recalling historical parallels of scientific suppression under totalitarian rule.
Concerns extend beyond simple censorship. The potential for the politicization of scientific findings is terrifying. The administration’s desire for control suggests a willingness to selectively release only findings that support their pre-existing biases, ignoring or suppressing evidence that contradicts their ideology. This could result in research being distorted to align with a predetermined political narrative, undermining the credibility of scientific findings. This is especially concerning when applied to the sensitive subject of veteran health. Imagine peer review led by individuals with limited scientific expertise, prioritizing political agendas over scientific rigor.
The suggestion that journals which demand submission clearance should face closure highlights the administration’s aggressive approach. This indicates a fundamental distrust of credible scientific publications and academic institutions. The potential loss of scientific expertise through brain drain, as scientists seek opportunities in more intellectually open environments, adds another layer of concern. This isn’t just bad science policy; it’s a direct threat to national security, compromising our scientific leadership on a global scale.
The parallel between this situation and historical instances of authoritarian regimes attempting to dictate scientific discourse is alarming. Such regimes have repeatedly used similar methods to maintain control over information and suppress dissent. The implications are not merely academic; they affect the health and well-being of veterans and society at large.
Ultimately, the order requiring pre-publication clearance from the Department of Veterans Affairs is a blatant attack on scientific integrity and academic freedom. It stifles research, compromises the health and welfare of veterans, and undermines the foundations of a free and democratic society. The implications far outweigh the perceived benefits of this poorly conceived policy. The long-term consequences for the scientific community and the nation as a whole could be devastating.