By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A U.S. Marine has been sentenced to seven years in prison by a Japanese court for sexually assaulting a woman in Okinawa. The court found Lance Cpl Jamel Clayton guilty of attacking the victim, including choking her from behind and attempting sexual intercourse. This case adds to a pattern of sexual assault allegations against U.S. service members stationed in Okinawa, where a significant portion of U.S. forces in Japan are based. The sentencing comes amidst ongoing local opposition to U.S. bases, fueled by previous crimes committed by American personnel and concerns over noise and pollution.
Read the original article here
US Marine Jailed for Seven Years for Sexual Assault in Japan
The news that a US Marine, Lance Cpl Jamel Clayton, has been sentenced to seven years in prison for sexually assaulting a woman in Okinawa is a stark reminder of the complex and often troubled relationship between the US military presence and the local Japanese population. It’s a story that’s been repeating itself for far too long.
This case isn’t isolated. The court found Clayton guilty of a brutal attack, involving choking the victim from behind and attempting sexual intercourse. The fact that this incident occurred in Okinawa, where a significant portion of US military personnel in Japan are stationed, immediately brings to mind the history of friction and the long-standing grievances of the Okinawan people. There have been other cases of sexual assault involving US service members in Okinawa recently. The incidents in the last year alone are a chilling reminder of a disturbing trend.
It’s hard not to feel a sense of anger and frustration. Okinawans have consistently protested the presence of US bases, fueled by the crimes committed by American personnel. The sheer volume of service members stationed there is staggering. With more than half of the 54,000 US soldiers serving in Japan based in Okinawa, the impact on the local community is enormous.
This issue goes back decades, and it’s clear there is a history of bad behavior. The anger and outrage stemming from these acts are completely understandable. It’s not just about this specific case; it’s about a pattern of behavior that has caused deep wounds and mistrust. The people of Okinawa are wonderful, and it’s easy to understand their desire to see the military presence diminished.
Thinking about the stories of others is also a difficult thing to reconcile. One individual’s experience of being conceived on Okinawa, and the subsequent description of events as “everyone was drunk and having fun,” is deeply troubling. The question of consent and the blurring of lines in situations involving military personnel raises serious concerns. This specific incident, and others like it, are not just about isolated acts; they represent a systemic problem.
The history of this problem is even longer than many realize, as this has been going on since 1854. The Treaty of Amity (Ryukyu-US) attempted to address this, yet the incidents continue.
The question arises of how the US deals with this once the serviceman returns to the states. It’s disheartening to think that a similar offense in America might lead to a path to power. This is especially concerning when considering the impact of such acts on a global scale, as some claim that these individuals are some of the “worst people” the US sends abroad.
The perspectives of those who have served in places like South Korea also highlight the problems. These are often troubled areas, and a lot of the guys are just sex tourists. The lack of respect for local cultures and the prevalence of such behavior are particularly disheartening.
When the military makes rules about being on their best behavior in other countries, it’s a sign that the rules are necessary. Even stricter rules aren’t always enough, because of the type of behavior that’s been mentioned.
If a US service member in Okinawa is told not to mess with women, the fact that it happens frequently is a problem. The discrepancy between the consequences for sexual assault compared to other offenses is also mind-boggling.
The response to these incidents is rarely sufficient. The cases get swept under the rug or end with punishments that don’t match the crime. There is an obvious need for justice, and those who are not willing to adhere to the rules should face swift and severe consequences. This needs to be reflected in the punishment. It is a betrayal of the trust placed in them and a disservice to their country and their fellow service members.