By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A United Airlines flight nearly collided with a SkyWest flight on May 13th at San Francisco International Airport due to an unauthorized left turn by the United aircraft during takeoff from a parallel runway. The close call, resulting in a minimal lateral and vertical separation of 1950 and 275 feet respectively, prompted an evasive maneuver by the SkyWest crew. The FAA is investigating the incident, focusing on the United crew’s actions leading up to the unauthorized turn. Both airlines are cooperating with the investigation.
Read the original article here
A United Airlines plane recently made a wrong turn during takeoff from San Francisco International Airport (SFO), coming dangerously close to colliding with another aircraft mid-air. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed the near-miss, highlighting the potential for a catastrophic accident. This incident underscores the ever-present risks in air travel, despite the numerous safety systems and protocols in place.
The near-collision involved a United flight that deviated from its assigned departure path, executing a left turn instead of the planned right turn. This suggests a possible navigational error, perhaps stemming from incorrect flight plan input or a misunderstanding of the instructions. The fact that the first officer, who may have been responsible for navigating, didn’t seem comfortable enough to correct the pilot’s mistake raises questions about communication and decision-making within the cockpit.
The near-miss sparked a flurry of online discussion, with many wondering whether such incidents are becoming more frequent. While the increased reporting of these events might make it seem so, there’s a crucial distinction between a rise in the frequency of these mistakes and a rise in our awareness of them. Past incidents might not have garnered the same level of public attention, whereas today’s heightened media coverage increases the visibility of near-misses and other aviation incidents.
Several commenters highlighted the complexity of air traffic around SFO, with its parallel runways and proximity to Oakland International Airport. This dense airspace environment presents unique challenges to air traffic controllers and pilots alike, potentially increasing the chances of incidents. The sheer volume of air traffic in the area could overwhelm the system, even with experienced professionals at the helm. In essence, any failure in communication, procedure, or technology could have amplified consequences.
The incident has prompted discussions on various aspects of air safety, from the competence and training of pilots and air traffic controllers to the condition and effectiveness of the underlying technologies and systems. Some have pointed to potential staff shortages and outdated equipment as possible contributing factors to such near-misses. Others have suggested that stress levels among aircrew or other operational pressures might also play a role in these incidents, perhaps leading to errors in judgment or communication.
Yet, amidst the concerns and speculation, the near-miss highlights the efficacy of the safety systems in place. Despite the error, the planes managed to avoid a collision; this speaks to the capabilities of both the pilots, who reacted swiftly to the developing situation and initiated appropriate avoidance measures, and the air traffic controllers who helped guide the aircraft to safety. This emphasizes the ongoing importance of ongoing training and the effectiveness of safety protocols in mitigating potential disaster.
Some argue that pilot error was the primary cause, possibly exacerbated by workload and communication issues within the cockpit. The first officer’s perceived inability to challenge the pilot’s decision-making warrants further scrutiny. But the broader implications cannot be ignored; understaffing, outdated technology, and the sheer volume of air traffic within such a complex airspace environment are all factors to consider, particularly in light of concerns over budget cuts within the FAA and other relevant government agencies.
Ultimately, the near-collision serves as a potent reminder of the inherent risks of air travel. While the vast majority of flights proceed without incident, the potential for severe accidents remains real. This incident should inspire a renewed commitment to improving safety protocols, investing in better technologies, addressing workforce shortages, and examining the interplay between human error, system vulnerabilities, and environmental factors. The goal, of course, is to minimize these risks and enhance the safety and reliability of our skies.