By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced criticism from Representative Kim Schrier during a House subcommittee hearing for spreading vaccine misinformation, particularly regarding measles. Schrier, a former physician, challenged Kennedy, who admitted to never having treated a measles case. Kennedy was also accused of lying to Senator Bill Cassidy about altering the CDC’s immunization advisory committee, which he later replaced with vaccine skeptics. Kennedy has previously made unfounded claims about the measles vaccine and justified religious communities’ refusal to vaccinate.
Read the original article here
Trump Keeps Siding With Israeli Intelligence Over the Pentagon, it seems, is a recurring theme, and frankly, it’s raising eyebrows. It’s not exactly a secret that Trump has a strong affinity for Israel, but the extent to which he appears to prioritize their intelligence over that of his own country is, to put it mildly, concerning. There’s a lot of debate brewing, and it cuts across political lines, making it a complex issue.
One of the key points of contention is the apparent conflict between Trump’s stance and the recommendations of the Pentagon. There are accusations of him actively siding with Israeli intelligence assessments, even when they contradict the findings of his own military and intelligence agencies. We’ve seen him do this with Russia too, which just adds more layers to the issue. His supporters are split, which really drives home the importance of this issue.
The narrative from some sources suggests that Trump might be influenced by personal interests, financial ties, and a desire for political favor. There are claims of significant donations from pro-Israel PACs and potential future business opportunities tied to Israeli development projects. These are all things that could explain the consistent pattern of behavior we’re seeing.
Another factor at play here seems to be Trump’s perception of who he trusts. There’s a sense that he’s more likely to believe those who tell him what he wants to hear, regardless of the source. This could be especially true if he perceives those sources as being in opposition to entities he distrusts, like the U.S. intelligence community. His appointments, particularly those who might be perceived as sympathetic to foreign interests, further complicate the situation.
The potential consequences of this behavior are far-reaching. We’re talking about the erosion of trust in American institutions and the potential for foreign interests to exert undue influence over U.S. foreign policy. It also raises questions about the security of the country, especially if critical decisions are being made based on information that might not be entirely accurate or unbiased.
Of course, there’s also the question of why this keeps happening. There’s a sentiment that he’s easily swayed by flattery and, potentially, by the promise of personal gain. Some people see it as a pattern, where Trump’s decisions are always about what benefits him most, and not necessarily what’s best for the country. This is consistent with the idea that he prioritizes loyalty to himself above all else.
Some people also argue that the intelligence community he assembled is part of the problem. He has been accused of putting incompetent leaders at the helm of important U.S. positions. Whether he trusts the intelligence that he has gathered from his own team seems to be in question, and many think the answer is no.
Ultimately, Trump’s consistent preference for Israeli intelligence, even when it clashes with the views of the Pentagon, is a complex issue. It’s a story that raises questions about his judgment, his motivations, and the potential consequences for American foreign policy and national security. This behavior is not new for him. Whether you agree with him or not, the fact that the same issues keep coming up is cause for debate.