By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Saturday’s U.S. Army 250th-anniversary parade in Washington, D.C., saw a significant number of attendees depart early, creating congestion at the limited exits. Reports described the crowd as “listless and low-energy,” with Trump apparel outnumbering Army-themed merchandise. Despite these observations, the White House claimed over 250,000 people attended the event, which coincided with anti-Trump rallies across the nation and the president’s 79th birthday. The parade, the largest military display in D.C. since 1991, proceeded despite inclement weather predictions.
Read the original article here
Did military parade crowd leave en masse? What we know is that reports vary wildly. Some news outlets described a “logjam” of people leaving early, even before speeches by Trump and Vice President Vance had begun. One reporter noted that “hordes of people” were streaming away, with a nearby spectator asking, “Where’s everybody going?” This observation suggests a significant portion of the crowd departed prematurely.
The White House, however, claimed an attendance of 250,000 people. This figure seems highly questionable, given various accounts suggesting a far smaller turnout. One observer, who watched the event via AP News, estimated only a few thousand attendees, noting that the area was packed *before* the military parade with protestors. This raises the possibility that the official count included protestors as part of the celebratory crowd.
Furthermore, the claim of 250,000 attendees might be based on RSVPs, similar to how sporting events report sold-out games even with many empty seats. There’s evidence suggesting organized efforts to inflate RSVP numbers by encouraging people to register and then not attend. This would significantly skew the official attendance figure.
Adding to the skepticism, several observers noted the overall event’s lackluster atmosphere. Descriptions included “pretty listless and low-energy,” with Trump apparel being far more prevalent than military-themed merchandise. This points toward a crowd potentially more interested in the political figurehead than in the military celebration itself. The parade itself was described as poorly coordinated and unimpressive. The sheer volume of Trump merchandise among attendees also contributed to the perception of the event as more of a personal celebration for Trump rather than a commemoration of the Army’s anniversary.
The significant disparity between the White House’s claim and eyewitness accounts warrants further investigation. The logistics of 250,000 people leaving the secured area through only two exits also raises questions about the reported attendance figure. The ease with which the crowd seems to have dispersed contrasts sharply with the image of a massive, enthusiastic gathering.
The narrative of a “mass exodus” needs careful consideration. While some people clearly left before the event’s conclusion, it’s crucial to distinguish between a spontaneous departure and a coordinated effort to artificially inflate attendance numbers then quietly leave. The possibility of paid attendees who fulfilled their contractual obligations before the speeches cannot be discounted. The existence of Craigslist ads offering payments for event attendance reinforces this possibility. These ads indicated a payment of several hundred dollars for participation, raising questions about the integrity of the official attendance figures.
In light of conflicting reports and the overall tone surrounding the event, it’s difficult to definitively answer whether the crowd left en masse. However, the available evidence strongly suggests that the White House’s attendance figure is an exaggeration. The event’s low energy, the early departures, and the existence of paid attendees all contribute to a picture significantly at odds with the official statement. The conclusion is that while there was some degree of early departure, the scale of it is unclear. The official narrative is significantly at odds with many firsthand accounts, leaving the actual size and behavior of the crowd open to debate.